this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
522 points (91.3% liked)

Lefty Memes

4202 readers
124 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, upvoting good contributions and downvoting those of low-quality!

Rules

0. Only post socialist memes

That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)

1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here

Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.

2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such,

as well as condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.

3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.

That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).

4. No Bigotry.

The only dangerous minority is the rich.

5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)

6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.

7. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

(This is not a definitive list, the spirit of the other rules still counts! Eventual duplicates with other rules are for emphasis.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 70 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

well yeah most of its operating software was derived from opensource projects, but capitalists exploited those opensource project without giving the tinest bit back, so...

[–] dohpaz42 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

For a while there, the Darwin OS was open source.

"It's better to be a pirate than join the navy" - Steve Jobs

[–] athairmor 5 points 2 days ago

Darwin is open source. It uses some closed source device drivers but the core OS is APSL which is an open source license.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

If you want to talk about Apple specifically, then consider this. When they began making popular tech like MacBooks and Ipods, they justified the prices by giving free warranties. They would replace or repair any device at no extra cost of the consumer. Well, they stopped doing that and then wanted you to pay an annual fee to get the same service. Then they did away with that and now it's pay per repair or replacement and the prices went up instead of down. My theory is that was their business target in the first place. Get their products wide spread, and then pull rug out from under the consumer. To me, Apple is the best example of capitalism

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

AppleCare still exists. So this is misinformation.

And just as an anecdote, I have not felt like Apple has ever “pulled the rug out” on me and I’m an Apple product consumer. Are you?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago
[–] disguy_ovahea 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

That’s simply not true. Apple still has the same one year limited warranty they had when iPods were released. Steve Jobs justified the higher premium because you were getting “the store in the box,” referring to the in-store troubleshooting and educational support at no extra cost.

Source: worked for Apple for over a decade

[–] trolololol 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What the hell is a store in a box?? Without cool aid it doesn't make sense

[–] disguy_ovahea 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It means support and education at no cost. Troubleshooting and diagnostics are free at the Genius Bar. You only pay if hardware is replaced out of warranty. Free device and software education classes are available all day.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Steve Jobs' name for a help desk at no marginal cost

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This isn’t really true.

Apple, at least here in the UK, give a 1 year warranty as is the law and anything repairs that need doing that are not the fault of the consumer (ie dropping and breaking the screen) are covered under this warranty. Furthermore, if there is a problem with a line of products then they will extend the warranties to cover that issue for a longer period of time.

You can pay to have AppleCare+ which will extend this warranty and add on accidental damage too.

There are plenty of legitimate reasons to shit on Apple without having to make up new ones.

Also, iPhones are a lot cheaper than they were a few years ago and they’re cheaper than their Samsung counterparts when comparing Pro vs Pro, etc.

Source: Worked for Apple for 3+ years and I’ve consumed many of their products, although I now only have an iPhone. For what it’s worth MacOS is infinitely better than windows.

[–] Soup 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Applecare is still around so you’re wrong already.

Look, Apple’s done some shitty stuff and as an iPhone and MacBook owner I won’t deny it. Every company right now is desperately trying to find ways to charge more for less because there aren’t really any corners left to cut for capitalism to pump stock numbers up but infinite growth is still making its usual demands.

Apple products are still way more robust than the competition and they’re way ahead on things like ARM and making OSs that aren’t complete trash(Windows is a worthless piece of shit and always has been, even at its best. I own and regularly use a self-built gaming PC, so I experience it all the time). I’ll buy their products because their shit actually works and can be relied on. Plus I was able to finance my laptop at 0% and honestly the price I paid for my 14” MacBook Pro was comparable to what I would have paid for the same tier back in 2010 when I got my first MacBook so honestly, with inflation and all, it was surprisingly affordable(it was still really expensive, I won’t lie).

Anyhow it kinda sounds like you don’y have much experience with these products or haven’t learned from your experiences with them and just want to ride that bandwagon. Look into the awful shit Samsung has been doing or how expensive some of the other Android options are and you’ll see that this goes way beyond your specific hate of “the evil fruit company”. Capitalism is just rotten everywhere.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] undergroundoverground 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think that's what they must when they say "built by capitalism."

I mean, any other usage would be utterly ridiculous. So, that must be what they mean.

[–] Soup 15 points 2 days ago

It literally is. The idea I’ve seen around is that these things couldn’t be built without someone getting the short end of the stick. They also believe that no one would innovate without a profit motive. These people genuinely believe that the only other option is flipping entirely over to that garbage attempt the soviets made at communism. They fundamentally cannot comprehend the idea of nuance and so “capitalism is the only idea that works”.

We know that CEO wages are insane and that the reason we can’t afford stuff is our stagnant pay. We know that people innovate for their own curiousity all the time. We know that capitalism actually hates innovation because it means retooling and spending money on R&D and we’ve seen it fight progress basically at every turn or watched it buy up competition so it wouldn’t have to any real work.

So yea, you’re right.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Also, many of the technologies that comprise the iphone were developed in universities

[–] xenoclast 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

For profit universities. In the states at least. Where students go into lifetime debt and their work is profited from. Occasionally they get a prize and pat on the head.

Then they spend their lives working for companies that make massive profits off their ideas. If they're very very lucky, some people might learn their names and what they did before they die, but that almost never happens.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's worse. Public universities that by definition are not for profit. And then all the other things you mentioned.

[–] xenoclast 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I find it hard to believe that a university of any kind in America is not motivated monetarily

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

This is based on a widespread misconception that non-profit organizations are not also pursuing money. They don’t get to take home the profits but they still want to maximize revenue and minimize costs to grow and sustain themselves. So while they don’t behave exactly the same as privately owned orgs, there is a lot of overlap.

[–] BMTea 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You're basically arguing that this process had nothing to do with capitalism. Like Apple isn't capitalist, it's just workers working. Like what is the logic here. Those workers didn't do it to create the iPhone... they did it because the capitalist who wanted to create the iPhone was paying them. So that his privately owned firm could compete against other similar firms in the market.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (12 children)

Well, it’s always “humans made this”.

I think it’s trivial to argue that without capitalism we would not have iPhones, they are the product of the desire to please a market to make a lot of money.

If the driver was "I want to build something useful for my fellow humans" that wouldn’t likely trend toward an elitist redundant unsustainable device built on the exploitation of cheap labor.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

If not for capitalism, we’d be missing out on internet ads, online dating and for-profit healthcare!

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Yes and workers in the Soviet Union also made telephones. But only for the party leaders who didn't see there was a need for ordinary people to have phones.

Yes, workers make phones in any system. But who decides how many to make and what price to charge for them?

[–] TAYRN 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (9 children)

Okay, sure, I'll play devil's advocate. The engineering that goes into a single iPhone is unfathomable. It would take an entire lifetime of study to even try to produce something close.

But Apple pays about a jillion engineers about a jillion dollars each, and so they're able to create new iPhones every year or so. That was 100% powered by capitalism.

Yeah, workers physically put the pieces together. Do you think any of them could design an iPhone without any help or reference? Or a single body to tie it all together?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Do you think people cannot collaborate without capitalism?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

People do all the time in academia and science.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] trolololol 4 points 2 days ago

Engineers are workers. Well paid yes, but you're going against the wrong people, they're not capitalists and don't make the decisions that matter.

Then, why do you think an a economy post capitalist wouldn't be able to develop smart phones? Do you think we'd return to feudalism and the world would devolve into dark ages and all the scientific knowledge would disappear?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (20 children)

Is the "help or reference" coming from other workers?

[–] TAYRN 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's coming from someone who dedicated their entire life to being smarter than you or me about electronics.

Go on. Give your opinion.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TAYRN 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

... It's coming from the culmination of, like 5 decades of absurdly educated engineering. If you want to call them workers, then sure.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (13 children)

They weren't workers? is this "absurdly educated engineering" like a magic ghost inhabiting the halls of Apple HQ? Is this "engineering" in the room with us right now?

Seriously, I fail to grasp the point you're trying to make here...

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›