this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
78 points (96.4% liked)

politics

18998 readers
2449 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] partial_accumen 51 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

JD: "We're effectively run in this country via the Democrats, via our corporate oligarchs, by a bunch of childless cat ladies who are miserable at their own lives and the choices that they've made. And so they want to make the rest of the country miserable, too. And it's just a basic fact."

Usha: “I think what I would say is, let's try to look at the real conversation that he's trying to have"

Okay Usah, what you're saying at best is that your husband, who is vying for the role of backup-President-of-the-United-States is such a poor communicator that he openly insults more than half of women in the USA (more than 50% of women are childless in the USA source). Thats a pretty horrible defense.

Usah: "“there are a lot of other reasons why people may choose not to have families, and many of those reasons are very good.”

Wait, so you think there are "bad" reasons for not choosing to have kids? As in, having kids has to be the default and if you don't then thats a problem? Usah, can I recommend a book for you to read by Atwood "The Handmaiden's tale"?

[–] NatakuNox 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Ask the Vances: So if a women doesn't have a "good reason" to not have kids then what... Who decides what's a good reason?...

These psychopaths want women tied to the stove and forced to have kids until they die. The wealthy elite are afraid their won't be enough poor, unhealthy, and uneducated people to exploit so forcing them to have children is the only answer they can come up with. Immigration? Conservatives: Never! Improving social safety net? Conservatives: That's communism! Improve pay? Conservatives: ROFL! Force women to be brood sows via removing medical care, removing women's autonomy in marriage/education/voting/sex? Conservatives: Now we're talking!

[–] kikutwo 38 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, let's try and look at what was being said by changing the words.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He tells it like it isn’t

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

He tellsn't

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago

"Let me tell you what he really meant in vague terms that don't actually contradict the meaning of him saying those cat ladies want to make everyone miserable."

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Hey Usha, as a not-white person, how do you feel about your husband staunchly supporting white supremacists?

[–] someguy3 21 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

She thinks she'll get a pass.

*Oh but apparently (some?) Indians think they're high on the racial ladder.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I think it could be an artifact of the Indian caste system, which is highly correlated (despite being refuted by many who benefit from the caste system), shall we say, with skin tone.

[–] MushuChupacabra 13 points 2 months ago

Let the couch fucker defend himself.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -5 points 2 months ago

NPR - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for NPR:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.npr.org/2024/08/05/g-s1-15408/usha-jd-vance-childless-cat-ladies
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support