“We” is “NATO”, but everyone knows he’s just talking about the US
gravitas_deficiency
joined 1 year ago
For context:
The judge last month banned the broadcasting of such footage to the public and press on the grounds that the images were "shocking and indecent".
However, he decided to lift the restrictions following calls from Ms Pelicot's lawyers for the trial to be open to the public.
"If these same hearings, through their publicity, help prevent other women from having to go through this, then she will find meaning in her suffering," one of Ms Pelicot's lawyers, Stéphane Babonneau, said.
Actually, that’s precisely how one decides if they have the nuts or not.
That’s why I poop on company time
suffering Irishman wincing, apologetically
Why do it be like it is?
They don’t think it be like it is, but it do.
I mean, I have family still living in CA. I was fucking pissed. Also the weaponization of tax code against blue (higher tax) states. He weaponized way more aspects of the American government against his opponents than most people are willing to admit.
I’m so glad I learned about this
If you couldn’t, I’d be at a ~~:.|:;~~ for words
Oh I’m stealing that
Israel is conspicuously absent from that list, and they absolutely do try to influence our elections (see: AIPAC)
cross-posted from: https://sopuli.xyz/post/15203982
Russian D-30 howitzer with anti-drone protection and ERA.
https://t.me/yigal_levin/69976
👀Russian D-30 howitzer with anti-drone screen and dynamic tank protection. Dynamic protection, in essence, is blocks of plastic that explode towards the cumulative stream of anti-tank ammunition and deflect it to the side. Placing this protection on anything other than the powerful armor of a tank is fraught with even greater damage to the “protected” object. Published by Balu.
@yigal_levin
**"
As the gifts went on, they began to suspect us of something 🤔
111
Also available with a roasted crab, which is what they’re famous for, but this version is still delicious, because those noodles are straight crack
view more: next ›
What is it, would you say… that… you do here?