this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
880 points (79.9% liked)

Political Memes

5313 readers
2547 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

While Education and Organizing is building the parts for a new engine the rest of the year.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I don't honestly see why that would be the case. If they've already won, why bother changing?

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

If the right never wins, they move further left to collect more centrist votes. If the right moves more left, the left moves more left to differentiate themselves and appeal to the more progressive crowd that might otherwise vote green party or some other third party.

This has actually been happening for the last few decades but in the other direction. Left leaning voters not turning out for elections, partially because Dems have a history of suppressing exciting progressive candidates meant that Dems sought more centrists to compete with the right. Particularly after 5 of the 6 presidential elections went to Republicans between the late 60s and late 80s So they moved further right as a result. Both Clinton's, Obama and Biden are not progressive, they're barely left of center. The Democrat Party actively discourages progressivism, particularly in presidential candidates, to make them feel "safe" and "reasonable" to centrists. That shift to the right meant that the right has had to appeal more to the relative eccentrics on the right like anarcho-capitalist libertarians, the Christian nationalists, and the white nationalists. And not just at a presidential level but on every level even down to school boards. Thus our current status quo.

Not that Nixon, Reagan, or the Bushes were at all good people, but at the very least they didn't feel comfortable publically and openly appealing to bigotry and the dismantling of the federal government as a campaign tactic. That is no longer the case with the modern GOP.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

If the right never wins, they move further left to correct more centrist votes

That would be the theory, but it doesn’t seem to actually play out in practice. Look at the UK, where worsening performance in recent elections and drastically worse polling at present is leading to their right wing doubling down and being upset that their leader’s policies aren’t right-wing enough.

Or Australia, where at the last election our right-wing had its moderates absolutely wiped out by even more moderate independents (and in some cases, by proper progressives). There are no prominent moderates left in their parliamentary party. As a result, the people who are left are the right wing of the party, and they have selected as their leader a rabid tough-line conservative.

[–] someguy3 6 points 8 months ago

To move the Overton window.

[–] newthrowaway20 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

As we see with the Republicans eating themselves, there will always be opportunists looking to take down their own and fill the Gap. But we can use that to our advantage to get the legislation we actually want. But we kind of have to take care of the crazies before we can 100% focus on fixing our house.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago (4 children)

That didn't exactly answer the question. If Democrats consistently get all the power, why would they bother changing? Don't they already have what they want?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Maybe we can ask that when they actually do get all the power, because they've consistently lacked the majority needed to do any worthwhile changes.

[–] Shazbot 5 points 8 months ago

Speaking for myself, voting for down ballot candidates is the first step towards changing a party. My home city secured a progressive majority in 2022, and previous elected progressives are now running for higher offices. It's always a process, and when done right provides better changes for the years to come.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Democrats aren't a monolithic entity that wants to gorge itself on power and then sit around fat and happy. It's a bunch of competing politicians who are constantly at risk of losing their seat - if not to Republicans, then, as in Cali, to fellow Democrats who propose a different line.

[–] PopOfAfrica 1 points 8 months ago

Dems haven't bothered changing even when they lose power. Part of the reason we are in this mess. They most go left or wither on the blue dog vine.