this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
439 points (78.5% liked)

Political Memes

5339 readers
3192 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

For me its even simpler though. All of these logical shenanigans are the circular energy that fuels the myth around the unchangeable two party system. If people simply voted for the candidate based on their values and policy, literally everyone to a T, it would shatter the two party system into fragments, and we would have to do something to accommodate them.

Thats at least my theory, although I still voted Harris because in my case my vote is in a place that matters. I would say I'm about half and half happy and upset about it but thats the best I could manage with the circumstances.

I do think momentum is building though if we can continue it through the coming years.

[–] chiliedogg 5 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Your theory has been proven wrong every single time it's ever been put to the test.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago

So has yours! Noones been able to change the two party system so far!

[–] TokenBoomer 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Example of when it was tested?

[–] chiliedogg 4 points 8 hours ago

Yeah. Every election in the US. Everybody can vote for whoever they want. And when people vote for someone that isn't one of the majority parties we get George W Bush instead of Al Gore.

If just 1% of Nader's voters had voted for Gore instead imagine how much better our would would be.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

No it wouldn't, the two largest parties from that first vote would eventually consume everything else and then we'd be right back where we started.

Unless you intend to abolish FPTP, arguing your intention to vote third party is mathematically the same as arguing your intention to vote for the 2 party candidate who is least like you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

You do know a vote is worth more than just the tally it adds to your candidate right? A vote not changing the result of an election is not the same as not having an effect on politics.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

No, it literally is the tally. Under FPTP it is entirely just the tally.

This math has been explained endlessly, trying to escape the proven math doesn't make you some believer in higher ideals and callings, it makes you complicit in the destruction of the republic.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Well claiming proven math just isnt the slam dunk you think it is unfortunately. But you are allowed your perspective, I just disagree with it.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The math doesn't care about your traitor perspective.

Defend the republic or be counted with the fascists who destroyed it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago

How many people do you think who you've called a traitor are actually going to agree with your position for it? Its eerie how similar that rhetoric is to the republicans right now.