this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
794 points (95.5% liked)

Political Memes

5339 readers
3192 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The DNC isn't being run to get Dems in office, it's a fucking grift where sometimes we do get a Dem in office.

True. And a cushy consulting job, or a few thousand in bonuses seems like an understandable inventive, if a misanthropic one.

But for those who do the footwork supporting such a system, I just cannot see why. What have the Democrats done to deserve such blind obedience? Is being not-Trump just that impressive these days?

[–] TexasDrunk 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Is being not-Trump just that impressive these days?

Today? Yes. Come inauguration day? Absolutely fucking not. If Kamala wins I'll talk shit, write letters, donate to causes, protest, and cause trouble from the first day she's in office until the end of primary season 4 years from now. Then I'm back on the train.

Unless we can get rid of FPTP. Then I'm talking shit every day all fucking day long while happily voting for a candidate who agrees with me most instead of the one I disagree with the least.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

If Kamala wins I'll talk shit, write letters, donate to causes, protest, and cause trouble from the first day she's in office until the end of primary season 4 years from now

Why?

Most people in America want to end sales of arms to Israel, don't want to be complicit in genocide.

And Harris is abusing her power by ignoring that to satisfy a few wealthy donors by threatening you all with Trump if you don't let her do what she wants.

The only way to stop abuse of power is to stand up to it. If you let her (or her replacements) just frighten you into submission with bogeymen you might as well give up any hope of progress.

[–] TexasDrunk 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Edit: this started out as a single word question. The diatribe came after my reply.

It's a reasonable question. Because I don't think she'll go far enough. And if she goes further than I think she will, I'll push her to go further left than that. I'm not nearly as far left as a lot of folks on Lemmy. I probably fall into Social Democrat on a good day. But that puts me further left than most US politics and pretty much all the politics in my home state.

I'm a pragmatist when it comes to elections. She's good enough to where I don't think she'll sponsor hunting parties for LGBTQ+ folks but I don't think she'll be trying very fucking hard to get universal healthcare or working with states to try to get rid of FPTP.

Unless your question is why I won't do it after primary season. That's because we don't fight in front of the kids. I'm going to support the furthest left feasible candidate because, again, pragmatic. I'll shut my fucking mouth, back the least fascist, and start trying to affect change again the second I can without shitting on that candidate during election season. Plus I like to take a break between election day and inauguration day because it's all so mentally exhausting and I'll be drinking more than usual for the holidays.

[–] TexasDrunk 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Sorry, I thought you were here asking a reasonable question with my other reply. If I had known you were like this I wouldn't have bothered. Is that why you replied with a single word then edited it instead of spewing your tripe initially?

If "Israel should finish the job" Trump tickles your butthole, just say so.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Sorry, I thought you were here asking a reasonable question with my other reply. If I had known you were like this I wouldn't have bothered.

Yep. So when you thought I was going to play the part of the meek little student at their teacher's knee you were happy to respond, but as soon as it was clear I might actually disagree... Instantly I must be a Trump supporter, because literally the only option you can think of that isn't agreeing with you entirely is 'Trump'.

It's pathetic.

[–] TexasDrunk 1 points 54 minutes ago

No, you fucking numpty. I thought you were genuinely curious. Understanding someone's motivations doesn't require you to be a good little student, it just requires you to be curious. People ask questions in good faith every day. You weren't curious. Then you were duplicitous about it and try to use gotcha tactics. You made sure to ask then edit after I replied so that it looked like I was engaging with a fucking moron instead of a good faith commenter.

Those are the tactics of the right. Even if you don't support Trump out loud your actions absolutely do. Go ahead and block me because any time I notice you engaging with my comments I'll go ahead and call you a duplicitous fucknugget. That's more engagement than you deserve, but I'll give you that much, you duplicitous fucknugget.