tabarnaski

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 17 hours ago

Old guy here. My advice: find something you really like and do that. Doing something you like multiplies by 10 the chance you'll get good at it. You'll have to try out a few things, which might give you the impression you are wasting your time; but it's better to lose 3-4 years finding your way than burning up at 35 because you hate what you do.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Time spend undoing/redoing stuff and delays caused by clients should always be billed, and contracts should address that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Did you ever stop and think about all the scientific and technical advances made since the invention of personal computers that allow you to send a turd emoji to random strangers?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

He's just seeing what Trump and the GOP are planning for the US and hopes he'll be one of the oligarchs at the top in the end.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You seem to believe that Trump saying "fake news!" is enough to consider that something is actually fake news. Anyone with a bit of critical thinking can verify this kind of affirmation and decide for themselves whether Trump is right or wrong. There's a difference between a truth and a belief, but your argument seems to equate the two.

If a judge in Brazil says an account should be banned because it spreads disinformation, I can go and check what was posted and decide if it's indeed disinformation. Now I might not have time to verify every affirmation like this so I tend to trust the judicial system of any country by default, unless I have reason to believe they can't be trusted.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Maybe the only way to avoid a large scale long-term climate crisis is to sue the hell out of those responsible.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (16 children)

I think there are a few simple criteria to discriminate between legitimate opponents and others: spreading disinformation, bad faith, populism, the absence of a coherent political discourse, etc. If a government identifies illegitimate opponents based on these criteria, I'm ok with that.

So, what makes you think these accounts were legitimate political opponents?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (30 children)

So the X accounts belonged to legitimate political opponents, they weren't spreading disinformation?

I don't know about the judicial system in Brazil but they don't seem that corrupted...

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago

He doesn't care, he thinks he'll get a presidential pardon after Trump gets elected.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago

This comment is a great illustration of what's wrong with social media. All communities eventually become echo chambers where no one really cares about respectful discussion, criticism or facts.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago

(...) you're a racist AND dumb.

To a large extent you're racist because you're dumb.

For the last few months they've traded their dog whistles for blow horns. More and more hatred is being normalized.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 2 weeks ago (15 children)

A steady stream of bullshit, just like before the 2016 election. Trump won, so it's not surprising they consider this their winning strategy.

 

A Mississippi sheriff said he was “ashamed” and apologized after five of his former deputies pleaded guilty to charges related to the torture of two Black men.

view more: next ›