seaQueue

joined 1 year ago
[–] seaQueue 2 points 2 hours ago

And the cost of time spent commuting 2-3h each way to and from work every day

[–] seaQueue 2 points 3 hours ago

Still can after the fact too

[–] seaQueue 4 points 3 hours ago

Wait until you hear about the $100k concepts of a watch they're selling worldwide for cash OR bitcoin. It's basically tailor made to allow foreign agents to send money to trump anonymously.

[–] seaQueue 1 points 8 hours ago

Assuming you have no subvolumes on either partition I would boot a live USB system and mount them then take snapshots of each. Send/receive the home snapshot to the root filesystem, remove the home filesystem and then extend the root partition to fill all space.

Once that's done mount the root snapshot (which is a subvolume in its own right, all snapshots are) and fix up your fstab to point at the new filesystem and subvolume names. Fix your boot cmdline as well using rootflags=subvol=SUBVNAME and if needed update GRUB.

Once you can successfully boot the system using the new subvolumes then (and only then) mount the root of the remaining btrfs partition and remove all of the old directories and files outside of your subvolumes.

A little tedious sure but easy enough with a bit of time.

[–] seaQueue 1 points 9 hours ago

Make a VM and play with both. I prefer btrfs on client machines because I find its snapshot and subvolume handling simpler and easier to perform common tasks, btrfs resource consumption is lighter as well. Where data integrity is critical (NAS, backup storage) I run ZFS.

You won't really understand either filesystem until you spend a decent amount of time using it so I'd practice now rather than on your important data.

[–] seaQueue 1 points 9 hours ago

You must take snapshots on the same btrfs filesystem. You can btrfs send snapshots to another filesystem after the fact but they'll no longer be deltas, they'll include the full content that they reference. Setting up deltas across filesystems is complicated, do yourself a favor and use something like btrbk to simplify the process.

[–] seaQueue 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, you can delete any snapshot at any time without risking data in others. Any unique data from the deleted snapshot will be discarded, any data still referenced by remaining snapshots will be kept.

[–] seaQueue 10 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It's possible to go after both. M$ has some fucked up practices that trick the user into using edge that shouldn't be okay

[–] seaQueue 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I recently had to explain to my boomer mom why a Ring doorbell was a bad idea. She didn't seem to get that the system is cheap because it's constantly feeding whatever it sees to both Ring and your local cops.

[–] seaQueue 25 points 3 days ago

Glassholes was coined back when Google was working on Google Glass about 10-12y ago and people kept theirs on and recording while in public

[–] seaQueue 35 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Welp, guess it's time for IR reflective tattoos to defeat facial recognition

 
879
AI Rule (lemmy.world)
 
470
Rule (lemmy.world)
 
251
Rule (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 months ago by seaQueue to c/[email protected]
 
607
Rule (lemmy.world)
 
350
Rule (lemmy.world)
 
285
Rule (lemmy.world)
 
437
Rule (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 months ago by seaQueue to c/[email protected]
 
586
Rule (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 months ago by seaQueue to c/[email protected]
 
 

One of the features I really miss from the snu site is multireddits. It would be really handy to have a similar feature available in boost that can aggregate posts from multiple communities into a single feed view.

553
 
 
view more: next ›