rob299

joined 11 months ago
[–] rob299 2 points 11 months ago (5 children)

I feel people are just misunderstanding, I don't see why there's so much backlash, let me explain my thoughts process in more detail.

my idea was actually more like this.

sometimes a bot might post an article, sometimes a real person. if the article is relavent, then real people might join in to discuss the article, which on this community this happens.

[–] rob299 -3 points 11 months ago

look at it in perspective, like on this community, alot of people like talking about tech, but when users aren't posting, they might still seek new content. so when the bots do post something, it brings life to the community and activity. and usually when they do post something it is relatively new if not brand new news articles that bring people together to talk about.

[–] rob299 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

the thing is apple devices aren't terrible, just over priced, they are better when it comes to less ads, or are they..? on most Android phones the ads come from the apps the user use, which are likely to be the same on an iphone anyways. YouTube anyone?

. and knowing how much free money apple gets from the search engine deal on the daily and yet they still charge $1000 for phones that right there, ends my trust for that company, forget about their privacy claims after that nonsense.

[–] rob299 6 points 11 months ago (3 children)

About time, unlabeled ads isn't even a requirement to make money off of ads, or is it..?

clicking on an ad generates more revenue then just seeing one if I remember correctly. which seems to be why YouTube encourages users to get use to waiting and clicking on the skip button, if on the browser site theres a chance of a user clicking on the ad and opening it's link.

[–] rob299 2 points 11 months ago

in a perfect world, when it is the better search engine, and they didn't cheat then i'd say do nothing. they did no wrong so why even ask this question?

[–] rob299 6 points 11 months ago

Look at it like this, how many wanted the Playstation 3 when it was cool, then factor in how many people bought that at launch vs the ps2 at launch. Actual market share matter more then opinions on what's cool.

[–] rob299 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

Teenagers might think they want an iPhone, but not everyone has the money for one and paying the bills. Whether they could make life changes to make more money is debatable, but the fact remains that not everyone does have $1000 to throw at a phone.

Because of this, the cheaper yet surprisingly still usable alternative, android has the larger marketshare. Since Google makes money on ads it's better for them to hand out more phones for cheap or in same cases for free, when a manufacturer makes a phone, when all those users see ads on YouTube and Google.

[–] rob299 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Yet android has the bigger marketshare.

[–] rob299 0 points 11 months ago

hadn't use an LG phone in some time.

[–] rob299 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I agree it's probably weird, unnecessary? eh depends on use case. lemmy (atleast the website) seems to meet me halfway with why I would use Bookmarks to begin with. one thing I can't seem to figure out is how to set custom categories for Lemmy communities that I subscribe to/order them without having to unsubscribe and subscribe again to communities, in the web interface.

[–] rob299 1 points 11 months ago

context of the post at hand is important, but good job for atleast looking out for potential mistakes.

view more: ‹ prev next ›