I love that for you
bennyp
It will be annoying for a minute but this change is good: it will help developers ship extensions faster and with fewer bugs by using standard JavaScript modules and IDE support. As mentioned in the blog: modules were standardized in 2015! At what point does it become acceptable to drop non-standard features?
this
is very handy when you want to carry over some shared context. Justin Fagnani described this
as an implicit first argument, which is a model that helped me understand how to use it better.
The Right Honorable
Thanks for the shoutout!
How about a browser extention which replaces the debugger keyword in all downloaded js source with void 0
or something?
agreeing with krogoth - i use vscode via github's web editor and other such buffoonery, and since many of my teammates also use microsoft's loss-leader false-flag not-quite open-source community trojan editor, I have to stay reasonably current.
so i'm conversant, and use it, but i wouldn't "switch" in the sense of "adopt as my daily driver", for reasons which should be obvious from the last sentence ;)
lol if you think this is a "twitter" problem you're out to lunch
Step one is usually to npm remove react
Growing pains? Red hat is 30 years old. The open source initiative was founded in 1998.
" already means something though (leader to pick a register)
Try the which-key plugin, and/or make up silly stories for your bindings e.g. "you surround a word "
Why complain? Is construct glorious empire for mother Russia!