Thorry84

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 27 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I hope this is the case, but I don't really think so. I got a call Thursday from a friend and he told me he and his whole department were losing their jobs. He was pretty upset about it. Apparently management decided they could be replaced with AI.

He and his team manage a medium sized in-house developed management application. It's a combination of stock management, product management and sales tools. Because the products their company sells are pretty unique, they never found a good off the shelf application to do everything they wanted. So they developed their own and connected it to the off the shelf applications they have for ERP and CRM. Pretty slick and his team and him are praised across the company.

Apparently the IT manager had gotten a very impressive demo for Microsoft Power BI with AI integration. Using AI tools to realtime develop an application. He was so impressed he decided they were going to fire the in-house team and have an external company use the AI to develop a replacement tool. The external company said they could use very cheap people as the AI would do basically all the work. And it would be done before the notice on the current team ran out (2 months).

He called me kinda in shock about the whole thing. Like that's not realistic right? That's not something Power BI can do? With or without AI? And even with AI it can't do that on such short notice? I told him he was right, that's not how anything works and the IT manager got duped. Either way, they are out on their ass. Now they are very skilled people and will probably find new jobs right away, but it still sucks ass. AI sucks!

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The word die can mean end of life, but has an alternative regular meaning: stopped working.

We use it all the time, for example "I don't know what happened, I was driving along and the engine just died." "Due to bad weather my power died." "I wanted to game, but my controller died."

Words can have different meaning and the verb die has a lot of meanings. And there is also a noun die, which is also in common use.

died; dying ˈdī-iŋ

intransitive verb

1: to pass from physical life : EXPIRE died at the age of 56 die young died from his injuries a dying tree

2a: to pass out of existence : CEASE their anger died at these words

2b: to disappear or subside gradually often used with away, down, or out the storm died down

3a: SINK, LANGUISH dying from fatigue

3b: to long keenly or desperately dying to go

3c: to be overwhelmed by emotion die of embarrassment

4a: to cease functioning : STOP the motor died

4b: to end in failure the bill died in committee

5: to become indifferent die to worldly things

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Joe momma LMAO GOTTEM

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Actually versions of MS-DOS were released for the MSX platform, which had a 8-bit Zilog Z80 CPU.

The number of bits mentioned when referring to processors usually refer to the size of the internal registers. You'll find that it doesn't actually matter how big the internal registers are. This just matters for the number of bits possible to process at the same time. So in order to process more bits, it just takes more steps, but it isn't impossible.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

The electron shells are just a model, that's not how it really works. Look at this image for a more realistic model of how an atom works:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_orbital#/media/File:Hydrogen_Density_Plots.png

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This picture is so French I can smell the baguettes and hear the accordion when looking at it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Eli5: Call company that installs solar panels. Give them a bunch of money (thousands to tens of thousands depending). Wait 20 years to get that money back on the lower energy bill. Replace the whole system because it is obsolete. Rince repeat.

For real totally disconnecting from the power grid is a bad idea. That means you need a lot more equipment and battery storage. This increases the investment significantly, without much upside. It also prevents you from selling the power you generate but don't need back to the power company (but depending on where you live this might not be a thing due to overproduction).

Also depending on you latitude and local climate it may be nearly impossible to go fully off grid without a huge system. Where I live we have about 6 weeks of very little to no sun (low sun combined with a lot of clouds and snow). That means all the power you need during that time needs to be collected previously and stored. This during a time it's cold af so the power usage is high (using heat pumps for warming the house, which is very efficient). This means a lot of batteries and a lot of solar panels, just to get through these 6 weeks. It could easily triple the costs or more, even if you have the room for it to begin with.

I would analyse the power usage and see where you can save money on. 300 per month seems very high. Where I live energy is much more expensive than in the US and my bill is closer to 100 per month.

Just call a company, have some panels installed for say 2500-5000 bucks depending on how much room you have on the roof and if you need upgrades to your power system. This will save you at least 50 per month on the bill. But be aware the ROI will be on the order of 10-15 years at least and more if you are unlucky. Saving energy is free and means money in your pocket right away.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I dislike her for very specific reasons

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ah you see, his mistake was he made it fungible, he should have made it non fungible. That way he would have been protected!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

When they got swept away by the water with their bikes, the movie switches to a montage of them getting the bikes transported to their garage. There they tear down the bikes, replace damage parts, do paint jobs. With a full 10 minute part about how they troubleshooted a misfiring issue on one of the bikes and the full rebuild of a carburateur. There's even a human interest part where they argue over replacing a part, some of them want to replace the part, others want to attempt a repair. Till one of the wraiths shares a story about how they were a kid working on old bikes with their dad and his dad never believed in throwing parts out, he could always repair it. So they contact a necromancer, which revives the dad for him to fix the part with his dad. And then the movie resumes like normal.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

I don't know why anybody would ever try new technologies again. If it isn't a HUGE success (and even sometimes when it is), companies drop support almost immediately making your investment useless.

 

Serious question. I know there are a lot of memes about microservices, both advocating and against it. And jokes from devs who go and turn monoliths into microservices and then back again. For my line of work it isn't all that relevant, but a discussion I heard today made me wonder.

There were two camps in this discussion. One side said microservices are the future, all big companies are moving towards it, the entire industry is moving towards it. In their view, if it wasn't Mach architecture, it wasn't valid software. In their world both software they made themselves and software bought or licensed (SaaS) externally should be all microservices, api first, cloud-native and headless. The other camp said it was foolish to think this is actually what's happening in the industry and depending on where you look microservices are actually abandoned instead of moving towards. By demanding all software to be like this you are limiting what there is on offer. Furthermore the total cost of operation would be higher and connecting everything together in a coherent way is a nightmare. Instead of gaining flexibility, one can actually lose flexibility because changing interfaces could be very hard or even impossible with software not fully under your own control. They argued a lot of the benefits are only slight or even nonexistent and not required in the current age of day.

They asked what I thought and I had to confess I didn't really have an answer for them. I don't know what the industry is doing and I think whether or not to use microservices is highly dependent on the situation. I don't know if there is a universal answer.

Do you guys have any good thoughts on this? Are microservices the future, or just a fad which needs to be forgotten ASAP.

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
view more: next ›