TheDannysaur

joined 1 year ago
[–] TheDannysaur 3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Technically... But there's also a lot of waste from the 500 pack that people throw out half of. It likely evens out.

[–] TheDannysaur 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Personally, I had to stop watching after a few episodes. The writing is just awful.

It's a lot of telling, not showing. And because of the poor writing, the actors suffer. There's not many good ways to deliver poorly written lines.

The changes they made might be logical, but the execution was poor. At least in the episodes I watched, it's like every character has to say exactly what they are feeling, and they do the whole "so what's the plan again" trope to remind the audience of what's going on way too often.

Sokka's character arc in season 1 was kinda botched... He was misogynistic in the original on purpose... And then got his ass absolutely handed to him by the Kyoshi warriors and it was a good moment. In this one they seemed afraid to hit the misogyny, so the moment was kinda lost, and the character development was flat.

There's just a lot is missteps, in my opinion, but the source is the writing. I don't think the acting is good, but it's because of the writing, not the actors.

[–] TheDannysaur 4 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

.... What?

Is this some weird "victim mentality" thing?

People love to use it because it got popular and grew to mean more than the original definition to the point where it just got generic to encompass a wide range of things. It's the same as cringe.

[–] TheDannysaur 6 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

I thought the same thing. People are obsessed with the word gaslighting.

This seems more like textbook hypocrisy. Person doing thing talks about the harms of others doing that thing.

[–] TheDannysaur 2 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Thought exercise: where is the line of justifiable behavior? If they shot him is that justified? If not, then there must be a line somewhere.

But I can tell you it's not a subjective thing, and the courts have ruled on things like this. Everyone has rights, even "Lil assholes" like Hill. I don't care for him at all as a person. He might be a shitty guy, but everyone gets the same rights.

[–] TheDannysaur 7 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

I'm not going to defend Hill's actions as correct, but if someone is an asshole do the police get to do anything they want?

Hard to justify him getting pulled onto the ground, knelt on, and handcuffed.

If he didn't want to open the window (and I've already heard everything about how maybe they couldn't see inside so it was a safety hazard - fine) - doesn't opening the door solve the entire problem? The door was open. Shouldn't that have been all the escalation of this situation that was required?

[–] TheDannysaur 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Omg what kind of dog is that? It's marvelous.

[–] TheDannysaur 2 points 1 month ago

Nate went over his issues with the model... And they seemed well founded. Trying to say Biden was a favorite at the end... Just didn't seem like it had any defendable points. You have to question the methodology at that point. It refused to decline his chances in the face of declining polls and terrible news cycles. L

[–] TheDannysaur 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This post is both insightful and troubling. Using generative AI services to simulate conversations without explicit disclosure can be seen as unethical. Some might argue that this damages the connection that users can feel towards each other, even in an online community. Such matters should be addressed in order to restore consumer trust in the platform.

(I wrote that to sound like a GenAI response, how did I do?)

[–] TheDannysaur 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just to be clear you're totally allowed to find someone of any gender or orientation charming without people questioning your motives :)

[–] TheDannysaur 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think this is rather impossible to answer.

One of the biggest issues is that context changes over time.

FF7 in particular is nearly unplayable by modern standards, imo. The amount of transition times (random battles with 20 second intros and 20 second outros) and lack of QoL features make it ridiculously hard to swallow. There's also an expectation of mindless "grinding" that has largely written out of modern games. Even the remake uses side missions, which at least have some interesting elements to them, rather than pure mechanical "go spend 2 hours killing basic enemies".

OoT has many good things going for it, but the live controls and weird camera behavior have been largely solved by games nowadays.

If you consider them in the context of the current time, both were unlike almost anything that had been seen. And given the price/console exclusivity at the time, I'd venture that very few people actually played them at the same time in their contexts.

Both were absolute revolutions of their time, which isn't capturable anymore. It reminds me of the movie Predator. It became the foundation for so many things, but modern movies have taken everything that Predator did and did them better. By modern standards it's a clichéd action movie with basically no plot. Makes it hard to judge.

[–] TheDannysaur 1 points 1 month ago

The saddest comparison that I can make is that they both cost 1% as much as your rent payment.

😭

view more: next ›