NFTs of art was really not supposed to be anything more than a proof of concept. I think the original purpose of NFTs was to be able to have an NFT representing title to land or something that you could then barter or sell on the blockchain.
NateNate60
Explosives don't seem smart. Why didn't they poison the chocolate instead? The enemy opens the chocolate, sees nothing wrong with it, shares it with their mates, and then now you've got five casualties who are none the wiser. Is that against the rules of war or something?
Pretty sure humans are not the most co-operative animals alive.
Bees and ants exist, you know
Uh oh. You should not have said that. Run for cover.
I know it's a copypasta, but I correctly differentiated GNU and Linux in my comment.
I cannot believe that actually worked.
Maybe so, but children don't always adopt the ideology of their parents. They usually do, but not always.
That doesn't make him a socialist. He doesn't espouse any of the core socialist beliefs there. He's just saying he's a "woke communist" (as described by the right), which could mean anything from a centre-left liberal to a Marxist.
Okay bud. Have a biscuit 🍪
"first and only Kanji".
If English had other logograms, I 🤔 what they'd be?
Doesn't that make you a communist?
While the NFT can't contain the entire title document, it can contain the hash of the title document, and then the title document is simply recorded elsewhere on-chain.