LongMember69

joined 1 year ago
sorted by: new top controversial old
.@KamalaHarris, Donald may be afraid of you, but I'm not. I have plenty of things to say - face to face. All you have to do is say when and where. I'll be there ready to debate. in c/jillstein
[–] LongMember69 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I’m not dismissing you for having differing opinions. I’m merely wondering what motivates someone to frenetically post low effort content on nearly every wedge issue over multiple hours daily.

.@KamalaHarris, Donald may be afraid of you, but I'm not. I have plenty of things to say - face to face. All you have to do is say when and where. I'll be there ready to debate. in c/jillstein
[–] LongMember69 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Does constantly posting low effort Russian agitprop all over Lemmy work? Or is it just to meet some kind of quota?

by Henry Voogd in c/traditional_art
[–] LongMember69 4 points 2 months ago

The painting is titled Italian landscape with umbrella pines which appears to be a name for stone pines. Cool trees.

rule in c/[email protected]
177
rule (lemmy.world)
 
Ten ways for Kamala Harris to win my vote in c/[email protected]
[–] LongMember69 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

How does that function in practice? Does the government now hold an active management stake in all these entities?

Ten ways for Kamala Harris to win my vote in c/[email protected]
[–] LongMember69 6 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Seize (that is, nationalize) the largest 100 corporations.

I understand the case for nationalizing key social infrastructure and utilities, but what is the justification for seizing the largest 100 corporations? Also why 100 specifically?

So... If she was to win the Democratic nomination and the general election (not likely but whatever). I know for a certainty that she will continue to fund the extermination of the Palestinian people in c/blackpeopletwitter
[–] LongMember69 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Please crosspost more. You must meet quota, comrade.

Just got this message/survey from a Democratic PAC, who would you pick? in c/asklemmy
Yuntai: Hiker finds pipe feeding China's tallest waterfall in c/world
[–] LongMember69 8 points 4 months ago

Ranked 20th, but out of how many countries?

Well I pulled the full source: the 2021 Net Zero Readiness Report from KPMG.

KPMG evaluated 32 countries. Out of which China ranked 20th. Not terrible, but also not all that impressive with that context.

Biden’s D-Day Speech Nailed the Threat of Modern Fascism in c/politics
[–] LongMember69 32 points 4 months ago (5 children)

I’ve gotta give you kudos:

I see you all over these comment sections like it’s your full time job and you consistently have the absolute worst takes. Brain rot GOAT

rule in c/[email protected]
[–] LongMember69 12 points 6 months ago (14 children)

Yes, it is still objectively right. Anyone deciding not to vote for Biden isn't automatically culpable for any Trump victory unless they voted for him personally.

This is an incredibly naïve and privileged perspective, clearly held by someone who has nothing to lose if Trump were to win.

rule in c/[email protected]
[–] LongMember69 17 points 6 months ago (16 children)

The reality of the shitty political system of the US means that it comes down to two bad choices.

However one of the bad choices would see the genocide of the Palestinian people accelerated. Not only that, but Trump has tried to oppose aid to Ukraine, which would allow for genocide of the Ukrainian people to occur unabated.

So if your actions to oppose one genocide results in the continuation of that genocide plus one more, is what you did objectively right every time?

view more: next ›