HereticalDoughnut

joined 1 year ago
[–] HereticalDoughnut 72 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I really cannot stand fandom sites. It always lacks content so pages are filled with useless information such as links to review sites. Also, it’s an atrocious experience on mobile.

[–] HereticalDoughnut 2 points 1 year ago

You’re a douch.

[–] HereticalDoughnut 9 points 1 year ago

Get a hobby already.

[–] HereticalDoughnut 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Seems interesting to me. However, I agree with some others on the forums that the names for the quality levels are kinda dumb. Would prefer something like the crude, good, excellent, perfect, etc.

[–] HereticalDoughnut 11 points 1 year ago

This is fantastic and unexpected news!

[–] HereticalDoughnut 6 points 1 year ago

Do you have friends who want to play games with you? Get whatever system they have.

[–] HereticalDoughnut -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is this a post seeking in-group reassurance and/or an attempt to divide and dogpile? What are you hoping to achieve here?

Regardless of your political point of view, good faith discourse and debate, including disagreements, is healthy and should be encouraged.

[–] HereticalDoughnut 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don’t know why I’m wasting my time with you. But that’s simply not the point made by OP. Not all charity is bad. “Charity” by the grotesquely wealthy for the purposes of manipulating their public image and tax evasion, is bad. It’s a grift that placates those on the receiving end without ever doing enough to change the underlying causes of their suffering.

[–] HereticalDoughnut 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

That makes you a troll.

[–] HereticalDoughnut 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

You know nothing about this person and have no evidence to make this claim. All you’re doing here is attacking their character rather than the argument.

[–] HereticalDoughnut 2 points 1 year ago

Seem you don’t understand how making a quality and good faith argument works. I’m not going to go looking for research to back up your claims. Also you’re responses to my criticism is childish and defensive. If you’d like to engage in a healthy discussion perhaps avoid petty personal attacks. Finally you have no idea what my stance is on the matter. I think there’s probably a lot we’d agree on, but you’re too busy trying to make enemies.

[–] HereticalDoughnut 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Broad generalization like “seemingly every liberal” makes for a poor argument. You either need to make a factual statement with references or note that’s it’s a personal observation such as “in my personal experience…”

Furthermore your premise “over population is an an argument for eugenics masked as environmentalism” needs to be further defined. It’s not clear these things are related without some examples.

view more: ‹ prev next ›