I agree. This guy's been all over this thread and all he's really said is "wouldn't it be better if nobody died?" Yeah of course it would. No one can argue with that and no one should argue with the poster above you because it isn't productive at all.
Dkcecil91
joined 1 year ago
Lol, gl with that. In the meantime other people are still allowed to set more reasonable and feasible goalposts.
It's really hard to tell what's sarcasm in this comment and what, if anything, isn't.
Edit: never mind, reread it and realized you're just a crazy person.
Not all that strange, just go by a planned parenthood and check out the crazies accosting people outside of those.
Man you must really hate jokes.
Who let the boomers in here? Why are we talking about communists?
The fact that charity is needed is inherently bad.
I hope you one day get to live "wontonly" as you'd like to. Then maybe you too can die in the street, addicted to drugs. Either way, maybe you'll spell wantonly right the next time you try to use a semi-large word while trying to sound like a blowhard intellectual.
Dude, the US was grown out of the blood of the people who were already living in whatever place they wanted to be at the time. Every president has done something horrible to people who were just trying to live their lives. Kennedy did an exceptional amount for the average worker despite that and if other presidents had followed in his footsteps, we would probably have a more egalitarian society today. Being a hard edged absolutist and unable to see in shades of gray and take into account the prejudices and circumstamces of the time period does not make you correct. Especially as all of your posts (apart from quickly googling a definition) have been very low effort and provided no candidate for who you would say is better, even though the other poster asked you for one several posts ago. Try being constructive instead of destructive, if you even know how.
I wouldn't say it's necessarily that too many people shouldn't have a voice. Just that too many of the people who shouldn't have much of a voice or any at all are the ones who really want to have one, often times.
There's no drag queen church to protect them from their crimes and shuffle them around to another diocese so that they can continue hurting children. I would say that's the most glaring difference here.
Double response to the same post. Unnecessary.