BentiGorlich

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

yeah exactly. On mbin it works this way and lemmy inserting the link breaks that. But it does it for communities in the community description sometime as well, though I don't know if it is just a user "error" or a lemmy error

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes they are, but you have my profile on your server and you do not need to leave the server to view my profile... @ user @ lemmy.instance should link to https:// mbin.instance/u/@[email protected] and not to https:// lemmy.instance/u/user

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Actually that behaviour is very annoying to other platforms. Mbin for example can only link to the lemmy server this user is on and no longer the local profile of that user. Example: @ user @ lemmy.instance gets converted to [@ user @ lemmy.instance](https:// lemmy.instance/u/user so on mbin this does not open the profile of the user on the local server, but instead links the lemmy instance, so you leave your instance to view the profile.

(spaces included so this won't get converted to mentions, etc)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

iodéOS here and I can't find it on my phone either (yes I looked at the system apps)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Well I did set one up today and the mails land in the spam folder for GMX, GMail and Microsoft (@live.de), although I set up SPF, rDNS, and DKIM. I have to take a look at how to setup DMARC, beacause my domain hoster doesn't allow free configuration of the TXT entries, you have to use templates and there isn't one for DMARC

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I wouldnt say that. however setting uo your own mail server is a lot of work, as you have to abide a lot of "security" rules (SPF, DKIM, DMARC, rDNS). Additionally some hosters reuire you to apply for port 25 to be unblocked (e.g. hetzner)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

On my instance I am the owner and moderator of every remote magazine, so basically all of them. I already created an Issue on Coderberg about this: #243 and ernest has an additional issue open #12

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

General Kenobi, you are a bold one

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yeah I got matrix only for that.
Yeah I am :-)

 

Right now the top bar only shows local magazines, as does the "Random Magazines" section.
Why is that and should federated Magazines be listed too?

For context: I am running a (right now) very small instance that has basically no local magazines. Therefore my topbar is nearly empty

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

If you have issues, feel free to @ me. I don't have a answer for everything, but I know of a couple of common mistakes.
And the matrix chat is relatively active

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

The main problem is that you have to do a lot learning by doing, because there are not clear instructions...
Other than the setup I'd say there is no clear drawback to hosting it yourself. I guess its even better than hosting something like mastodon yourself, because the content you want to get is already grouped in communities and you don't have the annoyingly long discovery phase one has when starting a mastodon server

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (8 children)

The main problems are the headaches you get while setting it up. Kbin is not in a state where you can just run a script and it works.

37
Just chilling (media.thebrainbin.org)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/cat
 
 

I set up an instance and got the feeling that outgoing federation is not really working. So this is testing that.

 

I just disovered that I (local admin) can edit the description, tags, etc. of a remote magazine (propably because I am marked as the owner on my instance)

 

For 1h my instance is hammered at 100% CPU. I just upscaled, but that didn't change anything. I now have a hetzner server with 4 cores and 4 processes for each of the messenger commands. I figured they just have to process a long queue so that makes sense, but only if the queue has an end...
The only thing I found to debug what the messengers are doing is this: php bin/console messenger:stats
which yields the same result each time I run it:

----------- -------
 Transport   Count
----------- -------
 async       100
 async_ap    100
 failed      2152
----------- -------

! [NOTE] Unable to get message count for the following transports: "sync".

Is there a better way to debug kbin messengers?

view more: next ›