ADonkeyBrainedFog

joined 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

Whatever makes you feel good my man

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

That's a pretty solid name actually. Props where it's due. But I'm still right about you. The mods are just as insecure about that too apparently

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Duly noted mr gofckyourself

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (6 children)

The amount of mental gymnastics you have to go through here is insane. I feel sorry for your two overworked brain cells being forced to type all these comments lmao

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I am real popular in algebra 😎

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It's a rabbit hole. The book of Enoch is pretty wild too. It was so popular that the New Testament was written assuming you had read it, but again, it was rejected from the biblical cannon. There's a bunch of references in the Bible that make much more sense if you know the Enoch. Some cool lore in there too. All of the apocrypha is cooler than anything in the official Bible cannon tbh. All ruled out because they wanted to make mass as boring as possible I assume.

But yeah, check out Gnosticism. It's an early sect of Christianity that believes all of the apocrypha. Much more based than our Christians I think. It kind of goes in an eastern religion direction while maintaining western mythology. Interesting stuff. It's considered the ultimate heresy which is reason enough to learn about it haha

This is a pretty quick intro to the topic. Sub 10 min to get the gist.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

You sound real upset for misreading my comment. Literally claiming the opposite lmao

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

The Gospel of Judas was rejected for the Biblical Cannon, but it would make Christianity make so much more sense. Basically says (along with other stuff) that the old testament god is a lower god that kind of gets off on making us suffer. Hence the impossible challenges used to damn us and the floods and stuff. All done to amuse them. Jesus is the son of the true god. The big boi who actually embodies love, but it so massive that they can't directly interact with us as they have a lot more big picture shit to do. Jesus was just one of MANY entities sent around to all corners of the universe to spread the message of seeing past the tricks of the lesser gods and the hate and guilt that come from them and find the light of the real, all loving entity. Explains why old testament and new testament god is so different and Jesus seems to give a ton of contradictory messaging to earlier lessons.

Not religious btw. Just find the topic very fascinating.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 5 months ago

Just ignore the fact Christians are doing the same thing. It's not an Islamic issue. It's a conservative issue. Muslims in America are predominantly left leaning and their views reflect it. I'm more worried about Christians in America trying to kill me than Muslims. They are more accepting of me here than Christians. My local mosque has a big trans rights flag in protest of our local politicians, and guess who were the ones to get upset about that. I'll give you a hint. It wasn't the people who were worshiping under the trans rights flag.

As a subject of hate born from essentialization, it's bad. Don't do it. Regardless of who you're essentializing. Systemic oppression can only happen with underlying dehumanization that comes from this thinking. Before you say "what about Nazis?", still no. It removes responsibility from them. That was the immediate and obvious excuse the people under Nazi Germany used to absolve themselves when the war ended. It was what was used to excuse the people brought to Western nations under programs like paper clip. They are people. They are just like you. You are capable of becoming just like them. Unless you're willing to accept that, you're much more susceptible to becoming like them.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

Nah. Definitely an introvert. The persecution complex on this thread is hilarious though so I'm poking the bees nest some. Y'all talking about being an introvert like being a black person in the American deep south in the 40s lmao

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Ah yes, the very comparable NYT and USSR. Brilliant analysis I must say.

view more: ‹ prev next ›