this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
3 points (80.0% liked)

Atheism

4001 readers
71 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] darknight189 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just listened to the debate. Wow, Knechtle was a diasaster for Christianity. Basically fallacious arguments ad naseum. He would not engage in any honest discourse nor answer simple questions. I know Dillahunty really wanted to hang up on him!

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 1 year ago

How could you possibly engage in an honest debate while maintaining irrational Christian ideas unless you are incapable of also engaging in a rational debate?

[–] LegalAction 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why would an atheist even engage a formal debate on this topic? Both sides are set; who is going to be convinced?

[–] ja2 1 points 1 year ago

Matt is paid for his engagements by the parties (or a mutual host) who are often seeking to make fools of atheists in front of their audiences. I suppose I've seen a few hosted by objective parties, although I question the sincerity of their objectivity. I'm not aware of any atheist debaters who aren't paid by a host or opponent, though it wouldn't surprise me to learn that some cultists do it purely for hubris reasons.

It's not really a matter of convincing anybody when it comes to these "debates." If anything, for Matt or the atheist on that side of the debate, it's about demonstrating to the other side's supporters that they are prepared, intelligent, practiced and rational.

I find it incredibly entertaining to watch the best atheist debaters back cultists into corners. Usually they don't lose any face to their audiences, but for those not under the spell it's an excellent reinforcement on some of the old classics. Every once in a while, you get to hear something particularly outlandish of the sort that as part of a conversation on any other subject would be immediately called out and ridiculed.