this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
118 points (96.8% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7163 readers
113 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

PHOENIX — Jacob Chansley, who may be better known as the "QAnon Shaman," has filed a statement of interest to run for Arizona’s 8th Congressional District in Congress.

Chansley stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 and pleaded guilty to obstruction of an official proceeding. He was originally sentenced in Nov. 2021 to 41 months in prison for his role in the Insurrection. He instead served about 27 months before being transferred to Phoenix in March 2023.

Chansley was described by prosecutors in his Jan. 6 trial as "the public face of the Capitol riot." He stood out from the rioters who stormed the Capitol, shirtless with a horned headdress at the dais where Vice President Pence had been presiding at the certification of the 2020 election.

As a felony convict, Chansley can run but not vote in the election.

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 60 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (5 children)

How the fuck is anyone associated with Jan 6th not banned from holding any government job?

He was convicted and along with jail sentences, bans from all government institutions should have been included.

…same goes for the shitty orange man once he’s convicted.

Edit: a word

[–] iBaz 48 points 11 months ago (1 children)

As a convicted felon, he’s barred from voting, but he can still run for office. FFS

[–] [email protected] 28 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That part is confusing AF. Like, he’s lost his right to chose government officials but still has the right to become one? What the actual fuck?!

[–] [email protected] 28 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think the logic is so politicians can't just slap someone with a charge in a kangaroo court to block them from running as opposition.

Given how fucked up the ~~justice~~ punishment system is in this country, I can't say I don't agree with it, even if I hate it in situations like this.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 11 months ago

And that logic somehow doesn't apply to the right to vote, which should never be removed ever.

[–] RojoSanIchiban 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

~~14th Amendment, Section 3. He IS banned.~~ Edit: totally forgot prior oath of office requirement, dbag joined the US Navy prior and violated that oath, but wasn't holder of any office so section 3 wouldn't apply.

Enforcement of this law is the issue. There is no method or apparatus detailed in the amendment for enforcement, so this gets left to Secretaries of State or the Judiciary to make a ruling.

This is what is being litigated in multiple states for keeping Trump off the ballot.

[–] themeatbridge 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That section specifies that people who have previously held office and sworn an oath to protect the constitution who have subsequently engaged in insurrection.

[–] RojoSanIchiban 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Oh fuckballs you're entirely correct and I'm dumb. I don't know why I struck that from my mind that the entire section required a previous oath.

[–] themeatbridge 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No worrries. It seems like a good idea to prevent anyone engaged in insurrection against the US.

[–] RojoSanIchiban 2 points 11 months ago

Agreed. The 14th needs clarification anyway with some "shall not be eligible" and details on how to define one having engaged in insurrection/rebellion (with or without convictions) so we just need a new amendment. Simple! ...D'oh.

Hopefully we get some good case law precedent out of the current state suits to give the 14th some teeth, even if it still wouldn't apply nationally or to this wacko.

[–] shalafi 2 points 11 months ago

Admitting you were wrong should allow double upvotes.

[–] shalafi 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Because there wasn't a law in place and you don't get to make laws retroactively.

A better question might be, how do we address this sort of thing moving forward?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] shalafi 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That's the 14th Amendment and only applies to people who took an oath.

"No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability."

John Q. Asshole can't be held accountable under this provision. We gotta play by the rules and the bullies don't. Sucks, but here we are.

[–] Rhoeri 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

How the fuck is anyone associated with Jan 6th not banned from holding any government job?

Murrika.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 11 months ago

I'm pretty sure "obstructing an official proceeding" doesn't and shouldn't ban anyone from holding office. He also shouldn't be banned from voting, but that is just a normal justice reform issue.

[–] Rhoeri 34 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

As a felony convict, Chansley can run but not vote in the election.

And this is all you need to know about American politics to understand why America is a fucking joke.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 11 months ago (1 children)

How can someone who commits treason and joins an insurrection swear an oath to the constitution?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago

Was he convicted of Treason anywhere? That should answer your question.

[–] LEDZeppelin 19 points 11 months ago

Wasn’t this the same traitor who complained about prison food being non-organic or something?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Holy fucking shit! I never looked closely at this guy or ever caught his name but I worked (briefly) with this piece of shit. He was fired after a couple of weeks for sleeping on the patio furniture in uniform in the middle of the sales floor.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And, was he good at his job??

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

He was ok with people but was usually crashing off of something and trying to find places to sleep during the day. At that time (2008/9-ish?) he just sort of gave off a weird hippie dude vibe and talked about the navy a lot.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It gets boring how the show runners come up with ideas that are crazier and crazier just to keep the people interested. They should just make the show end with a decent finale.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

I'm hoping this is the final season of The Republicans.

[–] drekloge 5 points 11 months ago

I get why this newsworthy, but can we not give this idiot our attention?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

There aren't 27 months between Nov. 2021 and March 2023. Unless they're saying he was incarcerated earlier and that time served was credited against his sentence... Poorly written regardless.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Why does it look like he's nutting in this photo?