this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
222 points (83.4% liked)

World News

38806 readers
2983 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 73 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This demonstrates why open, federated, censorship resistant platforms are necessary for a healthy world wide population.

Love them or hate them, voices silenced are voices oppressed.

[–] Mrkawfee 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes it's only a matter of time before Hasbara operatives try to suppress pro Palestinian voices on here. They've already taken over Reddit.

[–] fubo 52 points 11 months ago (2 children)

You can't be pro-Palestine if you're not anti-Hamas.

Remember, Netanyahu is pro-Hamas because he knows Hamas is bad for Palestinians.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sadly this is turning into one of those “I support the troops, but I don’t support the war” moments. People just hear “pro-Palestinian people” and immediately think “omg, you support Hamas and terrorists!”

[–] Zehzin 22 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I dunno. This just seems like one of those stupid talking points that sounds clever on the surface but when you actually think about it, it's dumb as hell.

Like, are you really stupid enough to believe Hamas would sabotage any legitimate chance of getting Jews out of Israel because they prefer Gazans to be oppressed? Nah. They'd rather be in control of Israel.

Unfortunately, the snowball effect has already taken hold, so those who can't think for themselves will just parrot what you're saying without second thought in order to fit in.

[–] atk007 47 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Duh. This censoring is why antisemitic conspiracy theories take hold in the first place. I understand moderation, but if you flag any discussion that goes against mainstream narrative as extremist, all that is left is an echo chamber. It's right out of 1984 playbook. I am wondering how long before Lemmy will be called an antisemitic platform for even posting news like that?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gazumi 22 points 11 months ago
[–] Mrkawfee 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Case in point both Instagram and X have removed the account of @eyeonPalestine

Website for reference: https://www.eyeonpalestine.ps/eye-on/index.html

[–] steventhedev 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

@eyeonpalestine was removed after showing signs of the account being compromised. NBC

[–] sfgifz 16 points 11 months ago (5 children)

These accounts were initially locked for security reasons after signs of compromise, and we’re working to make contact with the account owners to ensure they have access

Why not make it read-only until they make contact with the owners. Seems like an awfully convinient excuse otherwise.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago

Once you start making social media platforms legally liable for the contents of their users' posts, this is what will always happen. E.g. this state of affairs appears to be the express purpose of Canadian law. I don't know why anyone is surprised.

If you want free speech, you have to stop punishing the courier who delivers messages you don't like.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I would have thought the answer to that was obvious? Of course they are.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reddit_sux 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Pro-palestine posts are anti-semetic don't you./s

[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Anyone else find it weird how it's not okay to be anti-semetic, but it's okay to be: anti-Chinese, anti-Russian, and anti-muslim?

[–] MotoAsh 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Bigoted hypocrites seldom realize they're bigoted or hypocrites. At least not in any meaningful way. There were a shitload of them before this attack. Why so surprised they all have the wrong opinion? It's exactly what they always do: blame the victim.

These are the people that ask, "well what was she wearing?" after someone gets SA'd...

[–] reddit_sux 5 points 11 months ago

You can be anti war crimes without being anti semetic, or anti Russian, or anti China. You can be anti terrorist without being anti Muslim. You needn't be a bigot.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Yes, even encouraged.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (3 children)

What's the opposite of Betteridge's law

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

Worseflat's law?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Egdiretteb's law, obviously

[–] assassinatedbyCIA 7 points 11 months ago

Egdiretteb’s crime

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Rhetorical Bait

load more comments
view more: next ›