this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
344 points (95.7% liked)

World News

32187 readers
324 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PP_BOY_ 89 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (3 children)

As a Brit, I agree too. Europe is incapable of defending an allied nation within our own continent from invasion. We need to do better.

The military capability of European nations have to improve so we can guarantee our own security and be a more equal partner in NATO rather than a junior partner to the US.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You run into the weird issue, what if America can’t or won’t help.

Right now everyone depends on America to defend them but we may not always be able too.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (11 children)

The moment America cannot act as the unilateral head of NATO is the moment it collapses.

France, Germany, The U.K. and Turkey would then become the defacto " great" powers of Europe and the whole balance of power in the E.U. would be thrown off.

Not likely to happen for the time being, but if Trump somehow manages to get elected again the Europeans would be wise to consider their alternative options.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] bouh 4 points 1 year ago

I agree. But there's so much to do for a EU defense... GB is aligned with the US. Germany and a few other countries are entirely trusting the US. Hungary would probably side with Russia at this point.

I wish the war kick-started eu defense better.

[–] nogooduser 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t think that we are incapable of doing that. What we have done is a balancing act of assisting Ukraine against Russia without going to war with Russia.

If we were to have sent in troops from the start then it would be a completely different picture. I’m not sure that it would be a better picture though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It may have been different if there were boots on the ground, sure. But I think their willingness to invade would have been severely diminished if they thought Europe could easily defend Ukraine without the assistance of the US.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As an American, I've mixed feelings.

On the one hand, I think I think Europe owning it's own defense would be a solid move to ensure it's own sovereignty and independence as a modern nation.....thing.

On the other hand, I fear this could lead to US - EU military rivalry. While not necessarily the strongest bond in the world, I do value the relatively positive relationship the US and EU have. I hope that bond is preserved and hope we can grow even closer over time.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

nation…..thing

we prefer the term "sui generis geopolitical entity" ;)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] c0mbatbag3l 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, if we stopped being the world's police we might have tax money for something else.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 75 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (15 children)

As an American, I think my government has become WAY too inconsistent and unreliable. We might elect Trump again, ffs. America can’t be counted on to meet its NATO obligations anymore. Too many fascists are in positions of power and sympathize with Putin.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It benefits everyone to have distributed defense. Work together, but be able to have a basic level of your own defense is vital.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Europe shouldn't let it's home-grown defence industries languish in the name of strategic cohesion. Europe has no domestic competition to the F-35, no cohesive military procurement strategy that rewards European businesses, and no mechanism to avoid the shitshow of being entirely dependent on US defence contractors for maintenance of key defence infrastructure.

[–] Donjuanme 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It also doesn't have access to nearly as many raw materials as the United States does.

I wish we'd all just calm down with the military spending, but I also understand when dealing with the USA it's probably safer to not rely on then(us) to keep their(our) word

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Trump's presidency certainly showed that the US is one election away from balking. I'm pretty sure that's Putin's plan in Ukraine now.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Lots of euro leaders have said the same over the years. The question as always is, what will you do about it?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do nothing and blame Germany

[–] c0mbatbag3l 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Why didn't YOU make an army for us?!"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

"We tried it ... once ... many people died"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Well PESCO did get created. Denmark dropped their opt out from CSDP. Stuff like this moves slowly, specially upon there not being single hegemonic leader saying "We do this" and everyone else answering "Yes boss". EU is herding catch and it makes everything move slowly.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›