I LOVE the idea of wireless. But I haven't been able to get to to work reliably. To me the latency was absolutely too much. I suppose if you never play anything but use a piano roll or sequencer instead it might work.
this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2023
6 points (100.0% liked)
Music and audio production
1109 readers
10 users here now
Need a tip or want to show off your latest music production?
It’s here. Free software will be preferred but all are welcome. Don’t just post links without explanations, we expect you to comment your post or it will be moderated. If you ask something, be as precise as possible, provide context. And now, let’s talk audio!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
The latency is miserable!!!! Unfortunately I don’t think wireless is worth the convenience is this case
I have WH-1000XM3's which I've used in public or hotels. The main caveat I found is that I lose a lot of detail in mid-high frequencies. So I wouldn't rely on them over a good pair of monitors/reference headphones and do anything too serious... but using them as a tool in a hotel/public space to get ideas down is definitely better than not having anything.
You should look and see if there's an AutoEQ patch for them. Might be able to even out the response curve to something much more usable!
Interesting to hear about the mid-high frequencies. But I guess it makes sense that they’re not very neutral, considering they’re made for hifi listening and not producing/mixing music. I’m currently using the Shure SE215 which are also rather made for monitoring and hifi needs. So, I probably won’t have a huge issue with the earplugs not being super neutral.
They’re not only not neutral, but actively interfering with the signal (as long as they do active noise cancelling of course). But yeah, better than nothing still.
Hi had to work on some recordings while a building was build from ground up next to my office. This included driving huge metal planks into the ground. If I hadn‘t had my headphones (Bose QuietComfort 35 II) I wouldn‘t have been able to do my job.
So I would say, if it adds value/comfort to your routine, yes! If it‘s more a question of I‘d like to try because I can, do some testing first. I can only support what already was mentioned about latency and a neutral frequency band, which is hard to find with wireless. Read some reviews and (if possible) do some test listening in a store with your best known/favorite songs, to get a feeling for it.
In the end, you will adapt and know the strengths and weaknesses of your gear.
Ah, that’s great to hear! Thanks a lot for the information and tips. :)
Also using the qc35II and had the same thing, building going up across the street and needed to get work done, i'd wear them through the day then in the evenings do some mixing on the monitors to balance stuff out.
NC Headphones are good to have in your arsenal for testing purpose, in fact just like any monitoring setup, if you know your gear's response well and if you're skilled enough to anticipate how it will translate to other systems, it's a great tool to mix on.
I use a JBL 660 "entry level" NC headphone for A/B testing on a daily basis, it's a great tool to change monitoring context.
Bluetooth isn’t ideal for audio production due to the latency and audio compression inherent to the technology. That being said, the AirPods Max have an optional cable you can buy to use them with less latency. They’re very hyped headphones (as most consumer headphones will be), so might not be the best for mixing, but might be fine for your purposes.
view more: next ›