this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
35 points (88.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43526 readers
1606 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

7Zip does everything I need & it's open source.

[โ€“] Carighan 3 points 1 year ago

Aye, 7zip it is. Or in my case NanaZip since it integrated slightly better into Windows 11, but it's a fork of 7zip anyways.

[โ€“] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I may be weird but I use both Ark (default archiver in KDE) and 7-zip in wine. The reason is that 7-zip has better compatibility with some file formats but most importantly, Ark can't extract files with unicode file names from some archive formats (including tar!). This problem has been known for years and affect many other linux archivers, it's a pain in the ass.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn't there a command line 7zip for Linux + custom gui for it, or from another compression manager software?

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yep, it's unofficial but the tools are p7zip and p7zip-gui. Confusingly, there's also PeaZip (which uses the 7zip libraries) and has no relation to the former.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

p7zip doesn't seem to be maintained anymore, 2016 seems to be last update (direct link to source forge from the 7zip website).

However a direct official cli port seems to have been created. Not sure if it can be installed through a repo, or if it has to be downloaded from the 7zip website.

I saw some older threads saying it wasn't maintained anymore

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

p7zip doesn't seem to be maintained anymore

There's an active fork for it, and some disros (Arch for one) have switched to it already.

But yea, there is an official 7-zip cli port, it's being maintained but I haven't seen it in any repos yet though.

[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

All my real daily-use archivers were not listed in the poll, except 7zip.
Had to select "Other", but meant: gzip, xz, bzip2, unrar, rar and zip.

[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Sometimes -j, if it's a small amount of data, otherwise it's too slow. I've started using --zstd a lot recently; still getting a feel for the performance, but it's pretty good.

I think brotli has potential, but - again - I have to get used to using it more to get a feel for when it's safe to use (as it, it finishes before I lose patience with it).

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

7zip is the way.

Unless, I am working in linux. Then tar+gzip.

Unless, I am doing backups or ZFS. Then, LZO typically, due to speed and minimal overhead.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

7z usually.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

cmix :)

Seriously though, probably tar+gz/xz/etc.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

At least 32GB of RAM is recommended to run cmix.

Oof.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

atool, wraps many archiver in one command

https://www.nongnu.org/atool/

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

that thumbnail :D

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I just do either zip foo.zip foo or tar czf bar.tar.gz bar

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

tar + zstd - beat this!

[โ€“] Transcendant 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm a basic bitch, winrar for life. If I need mac compatibility I save as a zip instead of a rar. Seems I am alone in my basic bitchness, my assumption was that all compression utilities are doing the same thing... how come you're all using something different?

[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because there are free and open source alternatives available, rather than having WinRAR beg you to pay for it every time you open it. You should really try 7-Zip. Haven't looked back at WinRAR or any other utility since.

[โ€“] Transcendant -1 points 1 year ago

It doesn't bother me to just hit ESC after I open it, can see how that would bug others (though tbf that's the point, and it remains free for me to use despite escaping out of that request for decades). Are there any advantages in speed of compression by switching to a different program?

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

paq8o because why not? PeaZip handles it.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

7-zip on desktop and ZArchiver on Android.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Apparently it's something called file roller, which shows up in Mint as Archive Manager. And yes, I had to look that up right now. Never thought about it before.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

โ˜‘๏ธ "Compress the contents of this folder to save disk space."

(used sparingly, mostly on older HTML folders.)

(just did my ~weekly log back into kbin dance.)

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

7z gui on arch

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Default macos archiver - Keka if I have any issues