this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
40 points (93.5% liked)

science

14528 readers
614 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 days ago

The antidote, he added, is “being curious and being humble.”

TLDR there's almost no chance the people who are dangerously wrong are capable of fixing their opinions.

[–] acosmichippo 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

we need classes in high school or maybe even earlier that teach general media/social media/political literacy, that teach kids about technology, rhetorical techniques, fallacies, etc that are used to prey on emotions and biases. what does a (political) Dog whistle sound like? what are some red flags you might encounter while watching a conspiracist on Tik Tok? what can you do to prevent yourself from being radicalized by youtube's algorithm? what can AI currently do, and how can you identify it?

the problem is all this stuff moves so much faster than education does, so it's going to be a constant uphill battle.

[–] bassomitron 8 points 3 days ago

You don't even need to do all of that. Simply teaching kids to be curious, critical, and not afraid of failure prepares them in a much more universal/general sense.

A lot of these people were probably told they were special growing up and "really smart," which unintentionally reinforces the idea that they naturally know things and their identity is tied to being smart/knowledgeable. So when anyone contradicts that identity--confronting them with facts that don't align with what they thought to be true--it feels like an existential threat to their ego.