this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
113 points (91.9% liked)

World News

38746 readers
3400 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Over the past 10 years, rates of colorectal cancer among 25 to 49 year olds have increased in 24 different countries, including the UK, US, France, Australia, Canada, Norway and Argentina.

The investigation's early findings, presented by an international team at the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) congress in Geneva in September 2024, were as eye-catching as they are concerning.

The researchers, from the American Cancer Society (ACS) and the World Health Organization's (WHO's) International Agency for Research on Cancer, surveyed data from 50 countries to understand the trend. In 14 of these countries, the rising trend was only seen in younger adults, with older adult rates remaining stable.

Based on epidemiological investigations, it seems that this trend first began in the 1990s. One study found that the global incidence of early-onset cancer had increased by 79% between 1990 and 2019, with the number of cancer-related deaths in younger people rising by 29%. Another report in The Lancet Public Health described how cancer incidence rates in the US have steadily risen between the generations across 17 different cancers, particularly in Generation Xers and Millennials.

top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Raiderkev 8 points 5 hours ago

Someone I went to high school with just died of colon cancer last week. Guy wasn't even 40.

[–] cabron_offsets 18 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Plastics permeate our tissues and people are surprised by this?

[–] Blackrook7 1 points 25 minutes ago (1 children)

That and or wireless radiation I suppose..?

[–] repungnant_canary 1 points 7 minutes ago

Wireless communications radiation physically cannot cause increased mutation rates and this is quite well studied. Wireless communication operates on frequencies (for the most part) below 10GHz, which has wavelengths measured in centimeters and meters. The biggest wave that can impact human DNA is UV which has wavelengths measured in nanometers - orders of magnitude of difference. So no, wireless communications are super unlikely to impact cancer rates.

[–] Erasmus 45 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

We’ve poisoned our planet for the last 100+ years and now we are dying off slowly from the fruits of our labor.

The irony.

[–] acosmichippo 14 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

if that were the case, you'd expect more cancer in older people as well, not just young people.

edit:

Cancer deaths are consistently declining in the US. American Cancer Society's 2023 report

Despite the pandemic, and in contrast with other leading causes of death, the cancer death rate continued to decline from 2019 to 2020 (by 1.5%), contributing to a 33% overall reduction since 1991 and an estimated 3.8 million deaths averted.

[–] [email protected] 64 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

Plastic Sugar Teflon Roundup Lead Pesticides Fertilizers

Just a few of the hazardous substances we regularly come into contact with on a semi-daily basis. The cause of the problem is capitalism.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It's not just capitalism. I'm from east Germany and you wouldn't believe how much crap was buried, fumed into the air or pumped into the water in the name of peace and socialism.

Don't forget, Chernobyl happened because of a cost saving measure.

BTW, you forgot alcohol, tobacco, vapes, stress and enforced sedentary lifestyle in your cancer list.

[–] acosmichippo 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Old people come into contact with all that stuff too, not just young people.

edit:

Cancer deaths are consistently declining in the US. American Cancer Society's 2023 report

Despite the pandemic, and in contrast with other leading causes of death, the cancer death rate continued to decline from 2019 to 2020 (by 1.5%), contributing to a 33% overall reduction since 1991 and an estimated 3.8 million deaths averted.

[–] hemmes 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Agreed, the above doesn’t mesh with this variable

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

My point is that a lot of these things have flooded the market since the early 80s, which would make the tail end of Generation X the first generation that's been in constant contact with these things their entire lives.

[–] hemmes 6 points 8 hours ago

Scotch Guard (PFAS) was released in the 50s and everyone went gangbusters spraying it on everything.

Plastic based and molded products started to be seen around 1910 and surged in the 50s after WW2.

Processed foods were a thing since the 1800s with sugars as HFCS added into everything since the 60s.

Not to discredit what you’re saying, but, and this is solely based within the context of this particular headline discussion, it would cause you to look elsewhere. I’m thinking it’s more stress based. I’m working my butt off to evolve my small business just to survive. While we are having success and growth, it takes no less than 16 hours a day Sunday through Saturday to make it happen. I remember watching some family members and other inspiring business leaders as a kid in the 80s working regular 8 hour days and owning two homes.

Further to that, psychological medicine is so far behind and mental health has a major, if not direct, effect on physical wellness.

[–] APassenger 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

~~capjtalism~~

Greed, in any form. In any economic model. Greed.

[–] Zorque 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, but capitalism is an economic model that aids and abets greed. Where greed is rewarded almost exclusively.

[–] APassenger 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Which economic model do you prefer?

The distinction between capitalism and socialism isn't always a bright line.

And communism has yet to succeed.

[–] Zorque 4 points 3 hours ago

An economic model that doesn't prioritize profit over everything else... which is what capitalism does.

Let me know if you form an opinion beyond "all the dictators told me that this is what communism is, so I have no choice but to believe them".

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I'm still convinced that the aluminum in deodorants are not safe either...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

Aluminum is in antiperspirants, not deodorants (usually).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago

Same. When that news first hit I switched to non-aluminum brands just to be safe.

[–] twistypencil -2 points 11 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

TL;DR, the article says obesity rates and sugar account for a lot but not all of the increase so there is probably something else as well. Some suggestions from the article: artificial light, sleep-patterns, changes in biological clock as a result. Microplastics, especially for colorectal cancer. Ultra processed foods. Increased usage of antibiotics.

Obesity and sugar are presented as known cancer causes while the others are proposed or suggested by experts in the article but nothing to back it up yet, further research needed.

[–] acosmichippo 9 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

thankfully someone actually read the article (which is pretty bad in terms of accurately representing its citations). One of the other articles cited in OP says:

Research published in BMJ Oncology found there had been 3.26 million cases in 2019 - 79% more than in 1990. But experts cautioned against reading too much into the findings. The research did not take into account a 40% rise in the total population, while factors such as better reporting may also have played a role. The team, of experts from around the world, including the US, China and the UK, agreed no firm conclusions could be drawn.

Deaths (as opposed to "incidents") is a more accurate metric to track since it's more reliable in terms of detection (obviously) and reporting:

Cancer killed more than a million under-50s in 2019, a rise of over 25% - but with the 40% population rise, this could actually indicate a falling death rate.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 hours ago

Oh wow, this is really important context. That 79% figure is almost worthless

[–] tlou3please 6 points 9 hours ago

........okay fine, I have a lump around my ass ring and maybe this convinced me to finally get it checked

[–] thesohoriots 8 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Better back that colonoscopy screening up earlier then. I think it’s recommended at age 45 in the US, but I’m guessing insurance won’t want to cover screenings at 5-year intervals for an extra 20 years because money, dear boy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Wife and I both had diverticulitis resulting in resections under 40. She had no family history, I did. Still crazy

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago

It was recently dropped from 50 to 45 in the US. Was that also done for other countries?

Regardless of improved detection, the most likely explanation is increased obesity rates, which is covered in the article.

Last time I pointed this out, the toxin and micro plastics people blamed chemical exposure for increased obesity. They don't want the Boogeyman to be a fat guy.

[–] FlyingSquid 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Well yeah, we're all shitting out microplastics all the time.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago

We probably aren't shitting them out fast enough.

[–] Num10ck 11 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

hope its not from deburring the chinese plastic dildos

[–] hakunawazo 9 points 11 hours ago

Stay safe and use heavy lead dildos or the self glowing Marie Curie radium dildos instead.

[–] whotookkarl 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I bet it ends up being caused by something far more innocuous than any of the first guesses that come to mind.

[–] marcos 3 points 10 hours ago

The nightmare scenario is it being caused by something even more insidious and omnipresent than microplastics. The second nightmare scenario is microplastics.