this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
28 points (74.1% liked)

PC Gaming

8334 readers
712 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
28
A Valve engineer used ChatGPT to find a new matchmaking algorithm for Deadlock, and now it's in the game [lemmy room: [email protected] ] (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

[email protected]

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] spankmonkey 105 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Dunn acknowledges that he could have found the same answer with the right Google search terms, but says that the point is that he didn't have to: ChatGPT immediately returned what he was looking for even though he described it vaguely.

I remember when google used to return the right results even when the search was vague.

[–] thann 34 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Its so stupid, google "bipartie matching algorithm" and the second result is a stack overflow where the second answer is the Hungarian algorithm....

So every programmer would have found that immediately using the traditional methodology....

[–] spankmonkey 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yup, AI is frequently a worse way to do something we used to do, but with a crappy pretend to be a person responding veneer.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's not what I got. In fact, stack overflow isn't in any of my results. I got a lot of scholarly articles for various algorithms and none of them mention the Hungarian algorithm.

[–] thann 3 points 2 days ago

Weird, google might know I only click on stackoverflow links lol

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/23059735/fast-maximum-matching-algorithm-for-bipartite-graphs

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago

Same lol. Its incredible how shit it’s been made.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago

Right? I was thinking that exactly. I remember being in awe by how well google could do that, and now I actually dread having to use it and sift through all the crap.

I guess the same will happen to "AI" once they try to monetize it with ads.

[–] Clent 24 points 2 days ago

The question he asked to ChatGPT doesn't seem particularly vague to me. He used various algorithm names and concepts such that all he really asked is "I want a fruit like an apple but not as round" and it responded with "pear"

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago

Find a new algorithm? It's not creative, it just gave up one it knew about.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Imagine an article for TF1:

A valve engineer used Google to find a new matchmaking algorithm for Team fortress and now it's in the game