I wonder why the author chose to use the words “fully 3D printed”? I don’t think I’m being pedantic when I say that’s a very false statement.
this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
14 points (88.9% liked)
Hardware
527 readers
227 users here now
All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.
Rules (Click to Expand):
-
Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about
-
Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.
-
No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.
-
Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.
-
Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).
-
If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.
Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:
- AMD
- Augmented Reality
- Gaming Laptops
- Laptops
- History of Computing Hardware
- Linux Hardware
- Mechanical Keyboards
- Microcontrollers
- Monitors
- Single Board Computers
Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Aside from the motors and various electrical components, including batteries to unplug mobility in operation, most parts of the AT-AT were 3D printed with a standard 3D printer
From the article as well.
are structural support parts also 3dprinted? the article is unclear on this and id be surprised if it is.
I seriously recommend this dude’s channel. He’s a total nut. https://youtube.com/@jamesbruton?si=-vYstm1KKH6myZJi
Strange it doesn't mention the structural metal skeleton keeping it all together. That's like saying my car is completely made of paint