Isn't Iron Man being an arms dealer canon? I thought part of his whole thing was the creators seeing how unlikable they could make a superhero that people would still buy comics for. Arms dealers having a particularly bad reputation at the time because of the Vietnam war.
Broader MCU Marvel Cinematic Universe Blog, even ⚠Spoilers!
-
MCU Marvel Cinematic Universe Blog/Community - but broader, more encompassing, even ⚠Spoilers! It's a multiverse after all, hence...
-
OK: news, discussion, article, trailer, spoiler, rumor, analysis, theory, question, confusion, who would win (even vs different franchise, universe), box office, forecast, fanfic, fan cast, fan art, merchandise, toy, comics, cosplay, costume, w.i.p., content creation, pic, video, vlog, appreciation, admiration, rant, criticism, actor, creator, Marvel-related, etc.
-
OK: NSFW🔞, just tick the checkbox as needed.
-
No asking for money nor donation. Beware of scammers🤥.
Is he really a dealer though? More a manufacturer.
Did he not stop manufacturing of weapons in the first movie? That's how Obadiah ousted him from the company.
Yeah I'm confused by this article, the movie was clearly anti arms dealers and the whole evolution of his character was about moving away from war profiteering. Not to mention it's the whole reason he doesn't willingly create war machine in the second movie.
I guess they could have been even more critical about arms dealers, but I wouldn't really expect more aggressive messaging in a super hero action flick.