this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
136 points (94.7% liked)

Ethical Consumerism

85 readers
1 users here now

A place to strategize, plan, execute, and support each other in reducing reliance on unethical consumer goods.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 

I don’t know about y’all, but I will not ever be going shopping here.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jordanlund 120 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Kroger promises to lower grocery prices by $1 billion after artificially inflating them by $3 billion.

[–] Zachariah 29 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Oh, so just like their normal “sale” items.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

Prices are probably skyrocketing as we type in preparation for this "massive" amount of savings.

[–] Anticorp 7 points 3 weeks ago

This item is $9000, but if you let us track your purchases and give us all of your personal information, it's $3.

[–] [email protected] 87 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 weeks ago

Literal blackmail. Agreed

[–] Bonskreeskreeskree 5 points 3 weeks ago

More like extortion.

[–] givesomefucks 58 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Why would anyone trust them right after the price gouging during the pandemic and long after logistics had adapted?

[–] misterdoctor 10 points 3 weeks ago

That’s the neat part, we don’t.

[–] teamevil 55 points 3 weeks ago

Fuckin lies.... No for profit business ever said hey let's spend a bunch of money to buy another business to make less money.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

They aren't even saying that.

After the merger closes, Kroger will invest $1 billion to lower Albertsons’ prices, consistent with Kroger’s track record of fighting inflation and providing value to customers.

So, they're going to invest $1 billion to lower prices (which the writer speculates will be through "increasing efficiencies and improving its supply chain").

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

Which they already claim they actively do in order to lower prices

[–] Anticorp 8 points 3 weeks ago

consistent with Kroger’s track record of fighting inflation

LOL, fucking what? They're literally one of the major causes of inflation.

which the writer speculates will be through "increasing efficiencies and improving its supply chain

Oh, so firing more people, adding more self-checkout lanes, charging more for bags, and extorting distribution centers so they also have to fire a bunch of people?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

increasing efficiencies and improving its supply chain

That just sounds like sourcing lower quality food stuff to save their bottom line

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

"You should let us reduce competition in the grocery space, because with less competition prices will be lower."

That's a bold take.

[–] Passerby6497 5 points 3 weeks ago

$omething tell$ me it will probably $till work though.

[–] Zess 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Walmart has been doing it for decades to achieve its low prices. The problem isn't that it won't work, it's just still a shitty thing to squeeze every cent from your suppliers.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

Wal*Mart does definitely squeeze their suppliers, and it does have relatively low prices, but it's hardly a charity. It squeezes suppliers, not so that it can supply customers with low prices but so that it can provide profits to investors.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sgt_choke_n_stroke 27 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You didn't lower prices when you put in self checkout. Don't piss on me and call it rain.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Self checkout did lower the prices if you play the game right.

For example, one time I had 2 donuts in a bag, but I rang them up as just 1 donut. Please dont tell the cops.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If I see you stealing food, no I didn’t.

[–] omarfw 7 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

I wouldn't snitch even if I saw someone walking out with a wagon of money from the store safe. Fuck corporations.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

How did two donuts become one donut though? Are you a wizard?

[–] Passerby6497 4 points 3 weeks ago

I always seem to lose count when scanning the same item repeatedly. I'm sure I got close to 12, and that's close enough.

[–] Anticorp 23 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

This is where we're at now, corporations are issuing demands to the government, and the government is appeasing them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

Sounds like extortion to me. Revoke their licenses to do business until they replace their C-suite.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] njm1314 18 points 3 weeks ago

Those blackmailing fucks can go to hell

[–] Etterra 16 points 3 weeks ago

No that sounds an awful lot like extortion. That's a crime you know.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago

'improving their services'

=

extracting more value from their consumers

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago

Do it right now then.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago

First they added self checkout to reduce headcount, then came the price fixing/gouging. Then their shrink increased because people got tired of being fucked by Kroger. Then they had that shady deal with the UFCW. Then they decided to treat everyone that shops there like a criminal.

I'll never return.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago

Force them to break up into all their constituent companies.

Competition and the free market, also free of M&A's, will help pricing for everyone, including suppliers and customers.

Be great if we could elect anti-merger reps.

[–] iflyspaceships 12 points 3 weeks ago

Darth Kroger after the merger: "I have altered the plan, pray I do not alter it further"

[–] TheTechnician27 12 points 3 weeks ago

They have a concept of a plan to lower the prices.

[–] Tikiporch 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Someday, maybe soon, you won't have a choice but to shop at a Kroger grocery.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reddig33 8 points 3 weeks ago

“Sure, Jan.”

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

And then immediately raise them 5x a week later

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

I’m glad I have other options where I live.

[–] Dkarma 6 points 3 weeks ago

Ok. But your tax base is tripled and we set price ceilings on certain goods.

[–] DynoNoob 5 points 3 weeks ago

Yes. If there's one thing that all corporations want, it's to MAKE LESS MONEY.

That's why they want to reduce competition. It's so people can give them less money.

Now, some people might suggest that this sort of selfless generosity might go against their fiduciary obligation to increade stockholder value. But those people would be wrong because of course they're only doing this to eliminate competition and gouge customers, you bunch of gullible idiots.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

*terms and conditions apply. This offer is subject to change after one year of operation

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I thought "bidenomics" inflation dictated prices?? /s

?????

So it really is corporate greed then

(I know it's corporate greed, but I wanted to counter all the naysayers that say the price of groceries is strictly because of inflation)...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cryptiod137 3 points 3 weeks ago

If they take them over and can't fix Albertsons ( supply chain inefficiency is what I've been told), then the whole organization is gonna go under within a few years.

That almost sounds like a good thing, but I know that it wouldn't be .

[–] Mango 3 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah sure they will.

[–] CMDR_Horn 3 points 3 weeks ago

Plans change

load more comments
view more: next ›