this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
51 points (90.5% liked)

World News

32163 readers
765 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago

Nuclear weapons are dangerous. More at 11.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Nukes in Poland would be very bad to apocalyptic in the event of a war, but also it’s just passively dangerous; between 1950 and 1980, the US military reported 32 accidents involving nuclear bombs, including 8 whose cores were not recovered. After which they stopped reporting them. The USSR/Russia’s record is not significantly better.

That count does not include logistics mishaps, such as in 2007 when 6 nuclear bombs were mistakenly flown across the country and left attached to an unattended aircraft for 36 hours, at which point somebody asked why they had nuclear bombs just hanging off that plane without any guards or anything. No, this was not discovered because someone noticed their nukes were missing for a day and a half, this was discovered when someone stumbled across them.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

"This complicates our plans for a land bridge to Kaliningrad!"

[–] David_Eight 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So Russia can put nuclear weapons by the Polish boarder but, if Poland has nucs that's when things start to get dangerous lol

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Bet they wouldn't even be thinking about it if not for Putin's invasion.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yet sending Nukes to a small island near Florida is okay...

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago

rossia is dumb

[–] [email protected] -4 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

Poles, mostly.

[–] REdOG -5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

What's dangerous is Russian money with American usele~~ss~~full idiots