What a waste of taxpayer resources.
this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2024
60 points (90.5% liked)
Indiana
336 readers
4 users here now
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I just emailed him using this form to ask him what in the flying fuck he is doing. I encourage you to do the same.
Willing to blow infinite amounts of money on a fake ass spectacle but not willing to pass a single bill. What a fucking joke of a country.
I've been saying it for a while now:
The longer Biden takes to invoke title 10 and activate Texas NG under federal command, the more other states are going to send people, and the less likely they do t all listen when Biden inevitably does it
Ignoring this only makes it worse
The whole time, Republicans have been saying, "hE hAsn'T dOnE AnYThInG!!!1!1!1!"
Well, Joe, now's your chance to show them.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake
It isn't a mistake. Their base loves it.
I'll bet the people forced to go to Texas for this shit don't love it.
the state governments paying the guards to jack off at the border will eventually cost them elections. It makes more sense to wait for a real emergency and nationalize the guards then rather than protect republicans from their own false narrative
The only reason he wouldn't have done that by now is a private understanding that the national guard would refuse his orders.
What do you think would happen if the Federal government tried to activate the entire state's national guard?
How do you see that playing out?
Sounds dangerous and scary.
Bruh, title 10 is common...
Of course, for combat deployments, and operational support.
The context of the article, and some people's comments was using title 10 to assert military control over a state, and in the home state of the force, which would be a whole other thing.
Doesn't that make sense?
It's not just that, it happens often. It's not unusual for 10% or more guard time to be title 10.
Invoke title 10, have them secure the border from whoever else is opposing CBP, then send them all home.
If Texas activates them again, repeat.
I think what's going on here is you don't know about this stuff, but you don't. Just spend a couple minutes googling it
Dude, I was talking about your comment:
The longer Biden takes to invoke title 10 and activate Texas NG under federal command
Your comment implies putting significant or all of the Texas guard under title 10, to keep Texas from using them for border security? To keep Texas in line?
I think what’s going on here is you don’t know about this stuff, but you don’t. Just spend a couple minutes googling it
Do you? I question your reasoning for mentioning title 10, and for using the example of federally activating a state's national guard as a deterrent for other state's supporting Texas, if that's what you meant?
Should be read as "Seccesionists gather force in Texas", and should be treated as such
Not a day goes by when I'm not embarrassed by my state's government.
I've been gone like ten years and it's the same ol'thing
Now's the time, begin the Michigan invasion!! First Indiana, then THE WORLD!
Please invade, Michigan! I want cheap, legal weed!
I see a lot of comments conveyed unhappiness with Indiana governor and Republicans in general.
Any opinions?:
-
What should be done about the border security?
-
Is the threat of drug smuggling from across the border real or made up?
-
What should we do about fentanyl issues? I'm not interested/care about weed. It will be available soon/someday, just a matter of time.
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]
Fentanyl comes through regular entry points not remote wilderness (though the border wall access roads have made remote drops easier)
If we were serious about drugs we'd offer mexico incentives to dismantle the cartels, legalize weed, and offer more clinical support for addicts to reduce demand.
We have tons of border guards, more than enough. Its important to be clear republicans are the most upset about legal refugees and conflate them with "illegals" as indicated by their media constantly portraying bussing of legal refugees as though they aren't legal. More immigration courts are a must.
Its important to be clear republicans are the most upset about legal refugees and conflate them with “illegals” as indicated by their media constantly portraying bussing of legal refugees as though they aren’t legal. More immigration courts are a must.
I'm curious about more of this? Like the Afghans we brought over? Or are you talking about making it harder to receive asylum?
What should be done about the border security?
We have a border patrol. We can give them more money like Biden wanted. We also have immigration courts. We can give them more money Biden wanted.
Is there drug smuggling across the border? Sure. Do we have an expensive and pointless drug war? Yes. Maybe that should be the drug issue we concern ourselves with at the moment.
And fentanyl? Not an illegal border crossing issue. Most of it is brought in by U.S. citizens crossing the border legally. https://www.npr.org/2023/08/09/1191638114/fentanyl-smuggling-migrants-mexico-border-drugs
And fentanyl? Not an illegal border crossing issue. Most of it is brought in by U.S. citizens crossing the border legally.
This is dominantly why I hesitate to keep border security and immigration as the same issue in my mind. I know politicians will keep them together, but I don't think border security should be 'keeping out the illegals', I think it should be controlling everything/one coming in/out as best as possible. We also have a hard time finding contraband in shipping containers.
There's some pretty big fentanyl operations in China that keep the pipelines supplied. I wish we could get that a little more under control.
Isn't the "security" issue not really "immigrants are crossing" but "so many of them are vulnerable children we don't have the infrastructure to treat safely and humanely?"
Isn't that the exact reason why Obama declared the crisis in 2014, and why Trumps reaction to it was so derided?
It has very little to do with adult immigration and/or drugs.
@MSgtRedFox @FlyingSquid @Alto @Fedizen @Gingerlegs @the_q @NocturnalMorning @iamanurd @ScottStarkey @givesomefucks @happybadger Obvious first step would be to pass the compromise bill that Sinema and Lankford worked so hard on.
I got the impression that Young would have voted for it. One of the things I liked about Young was his at least standing behind the people that were already brought here: Young: 'Nothing's More Important' Than Giving DACA Recipients Certainty
He has also supported tighter border security things, so he seems a little of both.