this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023

81 points (95.5% liked)

News

23136 readers

4253 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

The CDC is helping states address gun injuries after years of political roadblocks (www.npr.org)

submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave to c/news

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 17 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] ravheim 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is one of those programs that was long overdue. You can't address gun violence if you're not allowed to share basic data about it. You can't have good safety measures in place without knowing what the trends are or where the issues occur. There have been several good studies that have come out recently that show important trends.

From the article about a study on gun injuries in Utah:

Nearly three-quarters of all unintentional injuries in the state are to males between the ages of 15 and 44, most of whom accidentally shoot themselves while mishandling or cleaning the weapons. With funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Utah streamlined its data collection on gun injuries and used that information to create a public service campaign to help prevent accidental gun injuries.

Sounds like basic gun safety training would help in Utah...

[–] FlyingSquid 13 points 1 year ago (5 children)

This just reinforces my firm belief that a gun safety course should be required before someone can purchase their first firearm.

[–] ravheim 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Absolutely. But a certain subset of people see that as an infringement on their rights. If it prevents injury or death, it's not an infringement but a reinforcement.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

A well regulated militia you say?

[–] hedgetank 3 points 1 year ago

I'm a gunsmith and an avid competitive shooter, and I absolutely think that mandatory training with firearms should be necessary. Right now, it's mandatory to take a hunter's safety course before you can obtain a hunting license, which includes firearms safety. In sane states, obtaining a permit to carry a firearm loaded in public (concealed, we won't get into the idiocy of open carry) requires similar training.

To me, it's no different than operating a vehicle or any other piece of equipment that has the potential to do great harm to others: You need to have training on how to use it properly and safely, the basics of the law and so on, and ultimately a level of enforced accountability in the event that you fail to follow protocols for safe handling, storage, and usage of said same.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Lots of people expect anti-gun people to abuse the concept through cost and time requirements. Sort of like they did with permits in may issue states. That is where opposition to requirements comes from.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The ATF already does this with suppressors, it's an arbitrary $200 and an almost 2 year wait to buy a simple tube that barely makes your firearm silent. Because morons that write legislation think that Hollywood mouse fart gun silencers are real.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This is why the class should be publicly funded and free for the student.

[–] BombOmOm 0 points 1 year ago

We used to teach gun safety and handling in school. Bring that back!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Neglect discharge while "cleaning" the firearm is often used to cover up suicide/attempts when it would be inconvenient to talk about. At least that was a thing historically.

Someone has to break a few basic safety rules at the same time to be in the position to shoot themselves. Those rules aren't complected or hard to follow.

We could bring gun safety classes back to schools if it's such a concern though.

[–] MicroWave 9 points 1 year ago

The amendment made access to granular information — things like who is being injured by firearms and the circumstances that caused those injuries — difficult to come by for health officials, policymakers and politicians. It would often take a year or longer to get such statistics as they worked their way from hospitals and through the public health bureaucracy. That has frustrated efforts to address the tens of thousands of gun deaths that occur in the United States each year.

Starting in 2020, however, nine states and the District of Columbia have received money from the CDC to set up pilot programs to speed the dissemination of this data, with the goal of using it for better public health approaches to the problem.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have significant doubts on how they classify accidental discharge in utah

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

It doesn't count if you are soaking.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

By address they mean asking people not to do it.

[–] hedgetank 1 points 1 year ago

Wait, so you're telling me that we're finally getting the kind of granular data that will help us look at/identify the root causes of gun violence and actually address the underlying disease, rather than just continually trying to band-aid the symptoms? Get outta here.