this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
449 points (98.7% liked)
LiminalSpace
2863 readers
1 users here now
Liminal spaces are the subject of an Internet aesthetic portraying empty or abandoned places that appear eerie, forlorn, and often surreal. Liminal spaces are commonly places of transition (pertaining to the concept of liminality) or of nostalgic appeal.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liminal_space_(aesthetic)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That is the Savyolovskaya Metro station in Moscow, Russia.
It's a beautiful and minimal station
It really is quite beautiful. Wish we had more of these in the States but it's looking like we'll never give up our cars.
Going the same way in the UK. London is the only city with a useful underground rail network and those stations are full of ads and are mostly badly designed
US government: best i can do is remove benches, so homeless people can't sleep in it. take it or leave it 😉
That's more just shitty and ineffective local town governments tbh.
Have you been to literally any american city? This isn't something that's just done by a few bad apples it's pervasive.
Just look at the horrific state of NYC stations. Even the "best" ones are in a pretty dire state.
Bro, I live in America okay? There's no federal law mandating benches be awful. These are all local laws or city ordinances voted for by citizens who are unsympathetic to the homeless.
I don't understand why you're defending this shit. Also, that's still the US gov's fault.
I am not defending shit dude. I am just saying to put the blame in the right place. The US government didn't remove benches like the original commenter said, it's the local citizens who've done it or convinced their city to do it.
That is the US government.
You are way oversimplifying things lol. There's a difference between federal (what you call the US government), state (i.e. California), and city governments (i.e. Los Angeles).
These bench modifications are done at city level and it's only because some residents have complained about homelessness in their neighborhoods.
You said it yourself that the US government does not have a rule stopping the abuse of the homeless by local government. That is US government failure.
And I do not draw a different between local and federal. It is still the US government, the US system as a whole. Pretending that there is no failure occurring here is nonsensical.
And the point wasn't about bench modifications, but the horrific and obviously visibly failing state of US infrastructure people can see with their own two eyes being completely ignored in favour of anti-homeless shit. But you've only focused on the minor point while ignoring the far larger one.
There's a lot of things I criticize the US government about but advocating for federal government overreach into something that's distinctly a local city issue is not one of them.
Yes it was. That's what the original commenter I was replying to was talking about. You're the one trying to strawman the discussion into something else entirely.
Btw, this is [email protected], not some political community on lemmygrad.ml. Go take your America hateboner and aggressive troll behavior somewhere else.
"Protecting the homeless is overreach lmao. This is why america is in the dire state it's in, because people that claim to be left wing are overtly right wing by the standards of literally anywhere else in the world.
I am British. Why should I like america? And why do you assume everyone is american? Also bringing weird ultra-nationalist rhetoric into this is fucking weird, and goes to show just how ""left"" you actually are. In the UK you'd be a tory.
yeah, i had no idea which part of the government decides it. just read about it about a month ago