this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
4 points (62.5% liked)

Cyber Activism

126 readers
2 users here now

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The state of medical privacy has become quite appalling lately. I started using a young doctor in a new office and they are gung ho on modern tech. That’s fine to some extent but they want to send me invoices and all correspondence via e-mail. No PGP of course. I did an MX lookup on their vanity email address & it resolves to an MS Outlook server.

I asked them for my test results. They offered to email them.

My response: I do not want sensitive medical info coming by e-mail via Microsoft’s servers. I did not give you a copy of my email address for that reason. It needs to be snail-mailed to me.

Perhaps of greater concern is that the receptionist acted like I am making a unusual request, and that they do not mail things. Apparently I am the only patient who has a problem with sensitive medical info going to Microsoft. So the receptionist is investigating whether she can get approval to mail me my results by post.

I wonder if someone in that clinic will have to run out and buy stamps because I have a problem with Microsoft.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] slazer2au 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Have you heard of SMTPS or STARTTLS?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'll take two things no one is using for 100, Alex.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Loads of people are using it. Most people do but it's not enforced. If I poison the opposing MTA's DNS I can bypass it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

If Google and MS don't then it doesn't matter.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Yes, and while it's use is common, it's not mandatory.