this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
24 points (92.9% liked)

Politics

1025 readers
2 users here now

@politics on kbin.social is a magazine to share and discuss current events news, opinion/analysis, videos, or other informative content related to politicians, politics, or policy-making at all levels of governance (federal, state, local), both domestic and international. Members of all political perspectives are welcome here, though we run a tight ship. Community guidelines and submission rules were co-created between the Mod Team and early members of @politics. Please read all community guidelines and submission rules carefully before engaging our magazine.

founded 1 year ago
 

The justices settled a question left open in 2018: whether businesses open to the public and engaged in expression may refuse to serve customers based on religious convictions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's important to note that this was examining a state law, so it does depend on the state, but in Colorado for instance, a bar could still absolutely not have a "No Blacks" sign.

Why not? Why isn't a sign an expression of free speech?

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The ruling specifically applies to the production of speech. A sign making company could refuse to make a "Whites Only" sign, for instance, without that being an example of discrimination against white people, per the logic of this ruling.