this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
1126 points (97.4% liked)

linuxmemes

20998 readers
2741 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    1126
    submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by Zeon to c/linuxmemes
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

    Seems weird it would fall under free speech specifically.

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)
    [–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

    It's just not how I'm used to thinking of it I guess. Sharing gun designs for 3D printer just doesn't seem like the sort of thing that would be covered by free speech. I always think of sharing your views, opinions, arguing for something and so on as free speech. My reaction would be to consider that other stuff as some sort of publishing or some such thing.

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

    My reaction would be to consider that other stuff as some sort of publishing or some such thing.

    Apologies for my poor reading comprehension, i am kind of dumb; can you please elaborate what you mean by that sentence?

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

    It just feels more like distributing a product or something rather than it being the speech mentioned in free speech. I'm not making a legal argument or anything btw, I'm just talking about what the term brings to my mind.