this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2023
527 points (94.3% liked)

Memes

1148 readers
347 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago (4 children)

A nuke destroys whole ecosystems...

[–] RisingSwell 11 points 9 months ago

Plenty of things will survive it, and the removal of the humans in the area may be a net positive.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

Chernobyl is doing pretty well now that it's completely uninhabitable by humans...

[–] HappycamperNZ 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So do we... at least the nuke stops killing new things after a bit.

[–] occhionaut 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Few months/years. The radioactive isotopes created in the explosion have a short half life. Both Hiroshima and Nagasaki are thriving cities today.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Both Hiroshima and Nagasaki are thriving cities today.

That contradicts the whole point that a nuke will destroy humans but leave the environment intact. A bomb of any kind destroys ecosystems. If humans reclaim the cities, it's not a "net positive" for the environment, despite the cynicism that's in the statement.

"Land back" is a much better approach since land under indigenous jurisdiction has much more biodiversity than average and especially than bombed land.

[–] fox2263 2 points 9 months ago

Perhaps 1 minute?

[–] Flimbo 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)