this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
-28 points (13.2% liked)

Conservative

363 readers
44 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

These are the stupid ideas the Democrats come up with. There are three billionaires in Oregon. Three. If this passes I suspect they will just move.

At the federal level, this would be unconstitutional.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PizzaMan 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Fuck em. There is no such thing as an ethical billionaire. There is no way to get that type of money without fucking other people over.

This should be done as a land tax IMO, but whatever.

[–] aelwero -5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The ruling entity, whatever it whoever it is, will never give the proceeds back.

The courts just ordered guiliani to cough up the lifetime earnings of 100 average Americans... he's a career politician, a consummate professional among the american ruling class. This is who you're suggesting gets to put their hands in those pockets.

What's the point? The point is that they've already got their hands in YOUR pockets, they're already accustomed to spending twice as much as they get out of your pockets, and giving them a windfall like that is just gonna raise the bar on how much they're able to spend, and when the billionaires get bled dry, they're gonna eventually look deeper into everyone else's pockets...

It's a fucking bad idea... We the people are not going to inherit the means of production, the spendy ass ruling class professional politicians will, and you're out of your fucking mind if you think they're gonna give it back. Giving them permission to raid pockets with abandon is invariably going to put your own pocket in those crosshairs. It's already in those crosshairs...

[–] PizzaMan 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I am not suggesting that a land tax is the only part of fixing the billionare problem.

I'm 50/50 on whether it will ever be possible for the U.S. to fix the problem of money being a part of politics without a straight up 2nd revolution.

As for your "hands in pockets" thing, we are running a deficit every fucking time. That needs fixed. We can't just not solve it.