this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
26 points (100.0% liked)

Daystrom Institute

675 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to Daystrom Institute!

Serious, in-depth discussion about Star Trek from both in-universe and real world perspectives.

Read more about how to comment at Daystrom.

Rules

1. Explain your reasoning

All threads and comments submitted to the Daystrom Institute must contain an explanation of the reasoning put forth.

2. No whinging, jokes, memes, and other shallow content.

This entire community has a “serious tag” on it. Shitposts are encouraged in Risa.

3. Be diplomatic.

Participate in a courteous, objective, and open-minded fashion. Be nice to other posters and the people who make Star Trek. Disagree respectfully and don’t gatekeep.

4. Assume good faith.

Assume good faith. Give other posters the benefit of the doubt, but report them if you genuinely believe they are trolling. Don’t whine about “politics.”

5. Tag spoilers.

Historically Daystrom has not had a spoiler policy, so you may encounter untagged spoilers here. Ultimately, avoiding online discussion until you are caught up is the only certain way to avoid spoilers.

6. Stay on-topic.

Threads must discuss Star Trek. Comments must discuss the topic raised in the original post.

Episode Guides

The /r/DaystromInstitute wiki held a number of popular Star Trek watch guides. We have rehosted them here:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Galaxy class starship was designed with the ability to separate the saucer from the stardrive section, so that the "floating city" part of the ship could be left somewhere safe while the rest of the ship galavants off to do something risky. We see this happen precisely once, in the season one episode Arsenal of Freedom. We also see saucer separation deployed for a handful of tactical and or emergency uses (such as against the Borg in The Best of Both Worlds, or to escape the breaching warp core in Generations).

So, this seems like a useful ability to have, and the Enterprise is constantly being sent into dangerous situations. Why not use this ability more frequently?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] T156 2 points 1 year ago

I think that it ultimately just wasn't very useful. From a production standpoint, it was an expensive and slow sequence that could be easily avoided without any issues.

From an in-universe standpoint, it was probably a dead-end technology. There are engines, shuttle bays, weapons, and computers that are concentrated in the saucer, which could all be useful in a battle, or in the aftermath of one. The saucer itself doesn't have any warp engines (they are shown to be able to run on fusion power, so a warp core isn't a necessity, although it's a bit slower than antimatter), deflectors, or other FTL mechanism, so if the stardrive is destroyed, it would be effectively stranded, and could be left a sitting duck for anyone who felt like retracing the ship's steps to hunt down the people trapped on there.

It also doesn't help that for the most part, it's rare that a ship will knowingly head into danger, and have the opportunity to drop off its stardrive section. Danger usually happens to the ship on the spot, at which point, it would be too late to go and drop off the saucer section.

The Prometheus project might have been an attempt at salvaging the concept, replacing the saucer with a whole starship, but given that it wasn't used in later ships, it was likely deemed a failure, possibly because at that point, you're just building multiple starships, and might as well make them fully fledged craft on their own.