this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
65 points (100.0% liked)

3DPrinting

15396 readers
43 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: [email protected] or [email protected]

There are CAD communities available at: [email protected] or [email protected]

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No, I don't agree with consumes 'way more' filament.

If your design calls for 1mm width wall. You're doing two passes with a 0.4 nozzle (0.5 width x2) or one pass with a 0.8 nozzle (1 width x1)

It's the same plastic.

You'll use more plastic on the infill, but you could arguably use a lower % infill if the infill wall thickness is larger.

So you could be using more plastic overall, but I don't think it would qualify as 'way more'.. maybe like 10% to 20% more.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

10-20 % comes out to $3-6 extra for the same parts across a 2kg reel. For parts that are structural or large (and not meant to be seen, or will be post processed anyway,) the advantages in strength and speed could be worth it.

But, that 3-6 adds up significantly over time.

I do agree that .6 and .8mm nozzles have a place in anyone’s kit. I don’t agree that this excludes .4mm or smaller nozzles from a similar place

It’s all about finding the right balance.