this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)
Haskell
65 readers
3 users here now
**The Haskell programming language community.** Daily news and info about all things Haskell related: practical stuff, theory, types, libraries, jobs, patches, releases, events and conferences and more... ### Links - Get Started with Haskell
founded 1 year ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think your version is arguably even more confusing, though I certainly wish we had something clearer. If you can suggest something clearer and equally fast available using extant primitives/instructions, I'm all ears and will happily make the change.
I guess you could express it more Haskelly like:
(if we consider bitstrings to be
Seq Bit
and I hope thatpadL
speaks for itself)Would that be less confusing? Or can you try to explain what you find confusing?