this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
5 points (85.7% liked)

Linux and Tech News

966 readers
4 users here now

This is where all the News about Linux and Linux adjacent things goes. We'll use some of the articles here for the show! You can watch or listen at:

You can also get involved at our forum here on Lemmy:

Or just get the most recent episode of the show here:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WhoRoger 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

software versions would have gone from 99.x to 00.x

Since it's not computer generated, it'd just go to 2000.x. Which is better in the first place.

Versioning scheme choice is arbitrary

It is, but it's still nice to be able to infere something out of it. If everyone was using YYYY.MM.x, and you had two binaries of two programs, you immediately know if one is much older.

I mean some versioning systems are just bonkers, take Android XX.x, with the accompanying different API.x, and older versions still referred to with cookie titles, so you always need to look shit up.

Or when forks happen and either completely copy the original's versioning, making a mess if they want to do more updates, or if they invent a completely new one, and then you again need to look shit up.