Neoliberal

62 readers

1 users here now

Free trade, open borders, taco trucks on every corner. Latest discussion thread: April 2024 **We in m/Neoliberal support:** - Free trade and competitive markets

Immigration
YIMBYism – ‘yes in my backyard’-ism
Carbon taxes
Internationalism and supranational governance – e.g. the EU, UN, NATO, IMF
LGBTQ+ rights
Democracy, human rights, civil liberties and due process Neoliberals can be found in many political parties and we are not dogmatic supporters of specific parties. But we tend to find ourselves agreeing more often with parties that espouse liberal values, internationalism and centrist economics, such as the Democrats in the US, Liberal Democrats in the UK, FDP in Germany, Renaissance/MoDem in France, the Liberal Party in Canada, and so on. **Further reading** - I’m a neoliberal. Maybe you are too.
The neoliberal mind
Neo-liberalism and its prospects
Neoliberalism: the genesis of a political swear word **News sources** Here are some suggested news sources that we like and tend to find reliable. Please note that posts and threads are not at all limited to these sources! - The Economist https://www.economist.com/
Financial Times https://www.ft.com/
The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/
New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/
The Atlantic https://www.theatlantic.com/world/
The New European https://www.theneweuropean.co.uk/
Vox https://www.vox.com/

founded 1 year ago

Growing share of Americans favor more nuclear power (www.pewresearch.org)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A majority of Americans (57%) say they favor more nuclear power plants to generate electricity in the country, up from 43% who said this in 2020.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is fair. But with proper planning I think it can be overcome. We can use wind and solar in the short term, but why not plan with nuclear in the long term?

We already have guidelines for 200 year buildings - many skyscrapers, for example, fall into this category. With proper maintenance, they could last much longer (the Roman Pantheon, though much smaller and less complex than a skyscraper, is an example of this.) Why not try this with a nuclear power plant? (Note: I don’t actually expect a power plant to last thousands of years, I am only pointing out we can build to last if we put our mind to it.)

I think our society has shifted far too much towards the short term, and we need to start investing in infrastructure projects that might only benefit subsequent generations.

[–] Beetschnapps 2 points 1 year ago

Exactly. Thread it in and make long term plans all while focusing on infrastructure.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Wind, solar and other renewable sources need to be the long term future. Nuclear can only serve as a in-between, as they are not absolutely safe as history has proven and from a cost perspective it makes zero sense to build new ones today. Even for the running plants I don't think a single country actually did successfully establish a safe final disposal side, so as of now, it's still theoretical that we can create and maintain them. And one we can, I am not sure why people are hyped to have nuclear waste below their feet, especially when there are already a lot of concerning cases where leaks in temporary storage was actually not disclosed by governments and shrugged away as "probably still safe". Sure, the idea is thatbfinal storage sites can't leak but... temporary ones also were not supposed to simply leak.
Why would we risk another Chernobyl or Fukushima when wind and solar is safe?

I really don't get why people are suddenly so hyped about nuclear power when we have alternatives, especially since a lot of them you can install on your own property to safe money and be a bit more independent.