this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
306 points (98.1% liked)
Fake History Porn
4383 readers
1 users here now
Welcome to /c/[email protected] , where fake history is made. Find a historically significant photo, come up with a fake history title, post it, laugh.
The name is a reference to the fact that the pictures should be worth marveling at. This is NOT a place for hardcore pornography. Tasteful nudity is fine as long as it fits within the context of the post (please mark it as NSFW).
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
So that guy definitely got a lethal dose of radiation, right? I thought a couple minutes near that thing meant certain death.
According to an article posted in the comments, this was in '96 and it was emitting 10 times less radiation. It says over 500 seconds would be lethal.
Still, that close and without full face coverage. I certainly wouldn't want to be there.
Do you think that the suit he's wearing somehow protects against the gamma radiation and neutrons screaming through his body? It's just to keep from tracking dust / tiny radioactive particles.
Yes, I did think that.
Isn't there a suit that can protect from radioactivity? Whats the point of the suit if the user gets fucked either way?
No, there's nothing human+portable that will provide enough protection for it to be worthwhile:
https://sciencedemonstrations.fas.harvard.edu/presentations/%CE%B1-%CE%B2-%CE%B3-penetration-and-shielding
Neutrons require similar shielding.
It's possible to block alpha emissions with skin/paper and beta with a sheet of foil, gamma and neutron are scary
Definitely agreed. The article said he just took a quick reading while the picture was taken. Apparently no long term effects would happen from the little exposure, but I'm not sure their reference for that.
Either way, the further away to it from me, the better.
No; that photo is from 1996 (a decade after the incident) where the vast majority of short lived fission products are well into their decay chains.
It's not safe to be around it for a long period now (and it still wasn't then), but it'd take at least a few minutes of getting up close and personal with it to see any short term effects.
FWIW NYT interviewed him in 2014. He may have since passed (I didn't look it up) but certainly not as a result of acute radiation exposure.
Fun fact: the film had to be exposed for several seconds for each of the images in this series due to the low light levels, which contributes to the amount of radiation 'fuzz' in the images. Think 1800s camera levels of staying still for a photo, just in front of a giant radioactive chunk of corium.
Why didn't they just bring bigger lights I wonder? Space constraints? Is this sitting inside a collapsed basement?
That appears to be the Elephant's foot in Chernobyl. When it was first discovered it apparently could cause radiation poisoning within 4 minutes.
That being said, the half life decay of the elephant's foot has been going on for awhile. Artur Korneyev, who took photographs appears to be alive to this day.