this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
15 points (100.0% liked)
Brisbane
953 readers
28 users here now
Home of the bin chicken. Visit our friends:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's not really a farce. They obviously made a dumb decision, didn't realise they were setting a precedent by letting it go to court. They want additional interpretation so that they aren't forced into expensive consultation for every building bus shelter and billboard is placed.
Interesting thought. So you think that they don't expect the decision to be overturned here, but for a judgment to explain why this case requires better consultation but other somewhat less disruptive buildings might not?
I think they're hoping for an overturn of the idea entirely, giving them free reign to make their own policies. Meaning when they break it there's no accountability.
If they can't convince the court that they should be allowed to govern freely I think that what you've suggested would be their compromise.