this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
432 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

58640 readers
4776 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Treczoks 90 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Nothing that cannot be fixed by a Linux install.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago (4 children)

For personal computing, sure. For enterprise environment, eh not really.

[–] raspberriesareyummy 18 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The only (larger) enterprises that insist "we depend on Windows" are those with shitty corporate IT :)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

And several governments from various countries and at various levels (municipal, state, federal)

[–] raspberriesareyummy 10 points 18 hours ago

there's

  1. US government, with a mandate to use Windows for the same reason that Boeing CEOs of the past decade aren't in jail for hundredfold manslaughter
  2. other governments, where again, "shitty corporate IT" applies, but with s/corporate/administrative

Even worse: governments using Windows are absolutely giving the US services direct access to all their confidential files & communication.

[–] WhatAmLemmy 39 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

With the amount of money corporations and governments have spent on Microsoft — the last decade alone — they could have filled the gaps in linux and the annual cost for ITSM would be significantly cheaper. Instead they've spent more and have grown far more dependent on proprietary software, they don't own or control, to manage their core business ops and data; the longer their dependence on SaaS, the more they'll pay.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yep, Imagine how good the software would be oif we had all the governments and enterprise paying into open source instead of Microsofts pocket.

[–] WhatAmLemmy 17 points 19 hours ago

Can you imagine a world where public money was only spent for the public good? What a world!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yes corpo IT doesn't have the skills other than buy the easiest options and raise tickets to vendors.

Those people choose to live the techno-dystopia for the sheer convenience of it.

They will just copy whatever the rest of the industry does.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

It's funny how you think that every single company just lets their IT choose what the best course of action is. Sometimes management just doesn't care.

[–] Aeri 0 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Or if you're into online gaming.

I have to fend off linux nerds with a bat. The bottom line is "that's cool and all but there are a lot of things that I can't do with linux and I'm not willing to make that big of a change"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

What are the issues? Genuine question.

[–] Aeri 1 points 31 minutes ago

Pretty much every multiplayer online game will at best lose its shit and not run, and at worst, ban you instantaneously if you try to access it with Linux

[–] Infernal_pizza 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Not the person you replied to but they’re probably talking about anti-cheat

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

I heard there were issues with those, but not sure on the specifics

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

What are the issues? Genuine question.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Man, I've been trying to migrate to Linux as my daily driver desktop over the last week. I love Linux passionately. But multi-monitor and 2.5Gb/s NIC support is just a disaster, basically to the point of completely unusable. It's so frustrating. It keeps pushing me back to Windows, because Windows just works when it comes to hardware.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

For multi-monitor: use Wayland. For 2.5Gbps Ethernet NICs, they never work properly on any system in regard to performance, but I presume you are referencing the subpar Realtek NICs not connecting? Depending on the distro, you likely won't have the driver and/or firmware package preinstalled to make it work.

[–] GreenKnight23 16 points 1 day ago

those are two of the easiest features to support.

what distro is giving you trouble?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

I run two multimonitor systems with different DPIs and 2.5gbe and they both run great. What issues are you hitting?

[–] finestnothing 5 points 1 day ago

Multi monitor issues are purely on your distro - and are pretty easy to fix. At least for me on arch and bspwm (I haven't touched a Debian based install or full DE in years), setup was as easy as making my randr script run when my WM starts up, I imagine it's even easier with a full DE.

For 2.5 gb/s internet... I've never run into any problems or even had to configure anything. Fresh barebones arch install with lan, 2.5 gb/s out of the box. If you're getting less (my guess is 1 gb/s?) it's almost certainly a hardware issue (motherboard/network card is only 1 gb/s, port on router and/or switch is 1 gb/s, etc)

If you're having trouble with something, I highly recommend searching for the problem after checking a relevant wiki (archwiki is an awesome resource if you're on arch). If you're having issues you can't find problems to, feel free to shoot me a message and I'll try to help you out. I'm no expert, but I've been exclusively on Linux for 3 years (since I graduated and no longer was required to be on windows at all) and haven't run into any issues that I didn't find a relatively easy fix for)

[–] werefreeatlast 0 points 1 day ago

This is very true. I remember back in the day I tossed my old drive full of viruses and windows and I started using Linux. That was 1998? No, it was definitely 2000 already. That was a really easy erase. I guess you could also just reuse the same drive. But that one has the click of death, so no.