this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
668 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

58501 readers
3923 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FierySpectre 2 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

With proper open protocols for communication with various services such a 'everything' app could become a thing at some point.

Where I live we already have a single app (owned for a large part by the govt) we can use to log in to most official services, and any decent-size service can apply to offer log in using it. Going from that concept it really isn't too much of a stretch to an "everything app" becoming a thing.

[–] Archer 1 points 9 hours ago

proper open protocols

Yeah that will never, ever happen, especially if the app is successful. We would have to legally force them

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Your thing and Leon's dream has one major difference. Thanks to those open protocols, multiple companies could build everything apps and compete on service, with all of them being able to access all you need.

Leon does not want Twitter to be an everything app, he wants it to be the everything app that you can't escape, owns all your data, and you can't get on with doing basic shit without paying him money.

He basically wants to monopolize everything, because he's bad at competition, because he's bad at it.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting 1 points 13 hours ago

Things being "a thing" are not the same as "acceptable outcomes occurring"