this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
113 points (95.9% liked)
Games
16486 readers
1436 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Their next game will be better, 5e held them back as much as its recognition boosted it's popularity. WotC will spend the next decade chasing the success of BG3 while these guys rinse and repeat as they always have.
There's no reason to believe there was anything special about BG3 other than any WotC funding and lore.
WotC funding? Reverse that, Larian had to pay WotC for the right to be able to make a baldur's gate game. This has been confirmed by Larian.
That's dumb and makes what they did all the more incredible. They would have done better if they'd done their own thing. Though it definitely wouldn't have been as popular. But people will learn this as WotC goes back to wasting the IP rushing out flops.
There's no reason to believe that there was anything special about one of the highest reviewed games of all time?
Their previous games, like divinity: original sin 2, were also amazing, though somewhat smaller in scale/budget
Sure, but playing through D:OS2 right now, there's still quite a bit more in BG3 that was special.
Bigger budget means more people and more time which let you spend more time on the little details. They were capable of BG3 after D:OS2, whether they did it or not. They're still capable of it. There's nothing special about the BG IP that means they can't make a game of similar quality in any other setting.
There's more than little details that I appreciate in BG3 over D:OS2, but I think that's just a team that got better at their craft.
Something being popular doesn't mean it's good just as something being unpopular doesn't mean it's bad. I'm not saying it's not better than their other titles, but there's nothing specifically remarkable about the BG IP that made it better than if it were in any other setting.
Ah, that reads a little different than your previous comment. Yeah, I'm looking forward to what they do next, but especially given that this was their best game yet, I definitely don't agree that they were held back in any way.