this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
493 points (95.7% liked)
Programmer Humor
19315 readers
123 users here now
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Rules
- Keep content in english
- No advertisements
- Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Missing type or identifier.
A const what?
Also, I read that you have to assign a const when it is declared. Something doesn’t feel right about this statement.
Its javascript, itll just let you do that
Pretty much sums up JavaScript's entire philosophy.
Let me just coalesce these types for you.
Imo, its better for it. A tool shouldnt tell the user what to do
But the CPU would be thoroughly confused in many cases. Like if you added a number with a string. This means low level tools have too and therefore people who do low level programming are confused and the generally carefree has rules can make it difficult to debug js.
Also I think rust making you write "safe" code unless you explicitly tell it otherwise is a great thing.
So I think that tools telling the user that they're doing something wrong is great, tools telling the user to stick with physical limitations for better performance are completely valid but what js does seem really weird with having constants be reassignable, making them nothing but labels combined with HTML I find it even more annoying.
Gets me every time.
I'm always more confused by adding integers to strings or something being an empty object because something else was undefined and the console didn't bother to tell me.
I think, most of us consider it part of the job of a good tool, that it prevents us from using it wrongly. Allows us to use it much more recklessly.
You're downvoted, but you're 100% right. The web is designed to not break. Engineers who can't accept that don't get to complain
const long pain = 1;
1L
:any
void
Maybe...
Ackshually you don't need a type qualifier in C
Well, assuming you meant type specifier, at least not before C99. After that it is required. C23 explicitly states that a type specifier is required for all declarations.
If you actually meant type qualifier, then no. That was never required.
Really? TIL.
Defaults to int if I'm not mistaken.
Huh?